Miscellaneous musings that I couldn't think of putting anywhere else.

Life is utterly miserable because of you personally

I can't take credit for this next piece. A work colleague gave it to me about a year ago and I've been meaning to put it up for an age. We don't know who the writer is but you have to applaud them for getting almost all of the worst human traits possible into one piece. It affected me when I first read it because there are things in there that seemed like they were directly aimed at me and it made me question how bad/shallow/empty am I?

I guess the wonder of the piece is that probably only Ghandi or Mother Theresa could have read it and something not apply to them. See what you think.

"Issues of injustice are passé, you complain of compássion fatigue. When in your car, you curse the traffic. A sacrifice for you is not buying what you know is tainted. A luxury is buying it anyway. If your hypocrisy is illuminated you smirkingly quip lighten up. Your desires are steeped in boredom: neophilia overrides ever appreciating what you might know well. Thinking, for you, is something that one can do too much of - it's the only thing that you do in moderation. When you choose to perfrom the indefensible, you moan that you were tired of there is no one else to blame. Howling in a storm of self-constructed anguish, the worst of your traumas would always centre upon yourself. Events of importance leave you cold whilst you remain obsessed with the oft repeated minutiae of your trivial existence. You effetely surrender to a reliance on hope so as to hobble any active involvements, just as you satisfy yourself with demonstrations of potential: validation through action would be too radical and dangerous. The course of your life has no qualitative difference to that of any other animal, save for the quirk that you have the cleverness to make pseudoconscious noises about your predicament. It has been a studied effort for you to take the cultures available and banalise then into the specious rhetoric that glosses the veneer of your comfort seeking. Happiness becomes the catch-all legitimiser for any personal indulgence. Compassion is something that you might theoretically advocate but in practice it's fuck-thy-neighbour-for-fear-that-they-fuck-thee.

Puerile minds would sneer at the semblances of reason that are contorted to be your considered approach. You, of all, have options to change and yet all you do is consolidate your privileges; in the face of difficulty you use these privileges to evade any cause. Conformism and medicrity are the comforting norms: any deviation is couched in bleated excuses of why you had no choice. You seek to sustain the unsustainable by grouping with the equally flip-minded and then insisting that your collectively held lies define some universal truths - with the remarkable coincidence that you emerge at the centre of things. Paralysis is what you aspire to if you thought your motives through. The complete form of this would be death. Rarely do questions fill your mind since your prefer to just preen your complacency with a mass of fucile truisms. Accept it, the future cannot lie with your kind. Then spend the rest of your life lying to yourself about knowing this. Forever defensive, you misconstrue open-ness for weakness and leap to exploit any trusting offer. For fear of thinking you hide behind tradition. For fear of commitment you utter only platitudes. For fear of feeling, you wallow in sentimentality. For fear of affirmation, you lean on cynicism. Expedience becomes the term for doing now what seems most personally profitable. Planning is the cunning to ensure that this remains so. When things are well things are as they should be; when something does not suit you it becomes a monstrous injustice: that the two are different sides of the same thing is carefully elided. Your wants overwhelm others' needs. The inequities are gloated upon with teleological argument that they demonstrate the natural order of things. Ordure more like. Give something more than detritus back you bastard."


How considerate friends/relatives can act after sending a text

This isn't a dig but I do find it funny when you are out with a friend or relative and they are texting someone.

You notice that they've understandably become quiet and distracted yet once they've finished and sent their text, they try to re-engage with you or the group with a noticeable doubling of their efforts. Almost as if they are conscious that they've fallen back and need a concerted push to bring them back into the game.

Whether that be with an over earnest 'are you all right?' even though they asked 10 minutes ago, a re-iteration of the point you were previously discussing "so what did she say again…" or an over emphasised 'let's party' physical movement, it can be quite endearing.

 

Lamest, cr*ppiest questions on a TV tie breaker

You've seen them, the silly little competitions they run at the end of TV shows with the garish graphics and lame talkovers.

The questions are always so brain numbingly stupid that they would only vex the viewers that didn't recognise how much they'd be getting fleeced on the extortionate text in cost.

I've seen some ridiculous ones in my time like, Arnold Schwarzenegger played the iconic role in

The Caretaker

The Terminator

The Nanny

But I saw one at the weekend that was an absolute belter for being so lame it had to be shared. It was at the end of a video game review show, so you imagine who they would expect their demographic audience to be. The question was.

Identify this famous Italian sports car company

Lamborghini

Leg of lamb

Mary had a little lamb

Sweet Jesus. Anyone else come across some imbecilic TV questions?

 

Tying shoelaces - Horizontal or criss cross?

Okay, this is another irrelevant posting but having laced up two pairs of shoes in the last couple of days, I was intrigued to see how other people 'arrange' their laces?

I've always done it so that you have the horizontal laces going across the body the of the shoe with it criss crossing behind, yet I believe others just randomly diagonally cross them over.

I don't know if the horizontal laces speaks of OCD or control issues and it would be interesting (not) to see if there was a correlation between those that went horizontal and folded the toilet paper but that conundrum can be for another day!

So, a complete useless enquiry but what do you do?


You know you are getting old when...

...someone tells you that you look dapper…when you are wearing a jumper.

…when you hear a new song and think 'yeah, this is cool and funky' and discover that it's been out for ages. Latest examples being Afrojack - Take over control (almost a year old) and The Saturdays - I feel alive (nearly 2 months old).

...you do a massive shop in Sainsbury's, Tesco's etc, pay your bill, grab the extra long receipt and think 'I'll enjoy reading that later'!

...you are genuinely amazed at the cleaning power of Cillit Bang.

…you make a conscious effort to stop wearing the slippers you were bought as a joke for your 40th (because you fear it's an acceptance of being old) but then find yourself glued to a programme called History's Greatest Tank Battles!

 

Brilliant play on a well known cinema speech relating to the current UK economic crisis

UK Uncut:
Why aren't you protecting the public sector?

UK Business:
Son, we live in a world that needs wealth, and that wealth has to be created by people in business.

Whose gonna do it? You? You, Ed Milliband? We have a greater responsibility than you could possibly fathom. You weep for the public sector, and you curse business people. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what we know. That public sector cuts, while tragic, probably saved our country. And our existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, creates wealth. You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want us making money, you need us making money.

We use words like competition, risk and reward. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent creating something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very wealth that we provide, and then questions the manner in which we provide it. I would rather you just said thank you, and went on your way, Otherwise, I suggest you take responsibility, and create a business you believe in. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to.

(apologies to Aaron Sorkin)

 

Nightclub toilet attendants

I was chatting to some women recently who weren't aware of the toilet attendants that us chaps regularly encounter on nights out. So for those women, and any male readers that don't go clubbing anymore, here is my description of these toilet guardians.

He offers a range of watered down fragrances, paper towels that he's kindly picked up, a turn on & off tap service assuming that he isn't busy and a selection of boiled sweet lollies that have been festering in a fetid room of man sweat, farts and dribbled urine for god knows how many weeks.

In addition to this fine service, which is available to purchase for the princely contribution of 50p to a £1, they will also regale you with a jukebox of chanted slogans, a selection of which I've provided below Freshen Up for the Punani!

Spray Yourself for the Beotches!

You Touch It, You Wash It!

Wash your Fingers for the Mingers!

Wash your Nuts for the sluts!

Wash your Pole for the Hole!

Wash your Toes for the Hoes!

No Splash, No gash

No Spray, No lay

No Armani, No punani

No Joop, No hoop

No Gucci, No coochie

No Davidoff, You don't have it off

No Boss, No box

No Paco, No taco

No Calvin Klein, No sexytime

No Dior, No whore

No Dune, No poon 

No Cologne, You go home alone

No Tissue, No issue

No Stink, No pink

No Lolly, No jolly

No Stench, No wench

No Soap, No hope

No Lotion, No lotion

No Wash, No nosh

No Stuff, No muff

No Gum, No cum

My favourite, because it was the first I ever heard and because it comes ready packed with a whole lotta energy is the belting classic

"You've got to freshen up, you've got to freshen up, you've got to freshen up".

This is usually recited with a loud hand clapping accompaniment and some considerable movement and energy from our esteemed toilet attendant.

As you can see, you're really missing out girls

 

Michael Moore's hypocrisy

I don't like this annoying, pugnacious child (see my other posting where his true colours are revealed) and thus I had to raise a smile at the irony of Moore suing the Weinstein brothers for him not getting enough of the profits from his film Fahrenheit 9/11.

I'm amazed that a man who made the preachy documentary Capitalism: A love story would be motivated into legal action over something as trivial as cash profits. Surely Moore's only motivation in making these beacons of morality and guidance is the educational benefit they offer and a platform for his sermons. I wouldn't have thought be would be interested in anything as grubby as cold hard currency.

Who knows, maybe he'll see nothing wrong with asking the NRA to help him with his legal costs as well.

 

Moaning about the cost of the Royal Wedding

It's an interesting concept when critics say that they should be mindful of the economic climate and not waste taxpayers money.

That's a fair enough comment but if they just had a private ceremony in the garden of Buck Palace what kind of outrage would that lead to?

The pomp, circumstance and ceremony of the event is what this country does well and it sells very well abroad. Our rich history and heritage is a bankable asset and the Royals are part of that. So the wedding would draw a lot of tourists and generate a lot of revenue that the country could benefit from.

To that end, maybe we need to consider at what point the country has 'ownership' of the Royals and that it is their obligation/duty to put on a show that 'gives back' in taxes and income.

 

Fascinating factoid about slavery in the US

I'm sure others might be aware of this but I've just stumbled across a fascinating and some could say ironic titbit of info about the first slave in the US.

Apparently he was a guy called John Casor and he became the first legally recognised slave in the US (Colony of Virginia) when the colonist Anthony Johnson convinced a Virginian court in 1654 that Casor was his property for life.

Obviously slavery is abhorrent before the accusations start flying but what's fascinating is that Anthony Johnson himself was black and a former slave.

It's just amazing to think that when slavery is considered the 'white mans burden' that the first legal case to set a US precedent would have been brought about by the actions of a black, former slave.

Now again I'm not claiming it absolves white people of their large part in the slave trade but, well, I thought it might be interesting for some as it was for me.

You can read more here if interested:

http://www.dinsdoc.com/russell-1.htm

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/secret/famous/johnson.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Johnson_(American_Colonial) 

 

Hate and dislike

I think hate and dislike can be refreshing sometimes.

So many people bandy about the word 'love' - "Oh I love my favourite poster, I love pyjamas, I love Ugg boots" that I think it's good to temper it with the opposite emotion sometimes.

I'm not recommending hate crime or it spilling over but if you can be passionately for something or someone, why is being passionately against something or someone so negative?

I caught a clip of Celebrity Coach Trip on Harry Hill. David van Day was getting booted off and all the other celebrities were so apologetic and so on tip toes saying they didn't realise it would get him off and it wasn't anything personal.

It was such a breath of fresh air when they went to Cheryl Baker who said it was personal, she despised everything about him and there was no one she hated more than David van Day. I respected her for having the front to admit that she couldn't stand him and not 'cosy up for the cameras'.

Having an online argument with a hint of dislike can sometimes force you to research your opinion far more thoroughly and help raise your game with regards to your written response. I've had some nigglw with people on forums before and I think the 'distillation of the argument' was a benefit.

In a way, it can be a lot more productive than a simply "Yes, I love custard creams as well".

 

Mis-direction on date rape drugs

I remember reading an article a few months back about the 'hoopla' surrounding date rape drugs.

They were saying that despite numerous police toxicologist reports, they regularly found it hard to determine the use of date rape drugs and that a far greater proportion of women were claiming they'd been drugged (and avoiding wagging fingers) rather than admitting that they'd been too smashed to stop an act going ahead.

Don't get me wrong, rape is abhorrent and a disgusting crime, and I'm not saying women who get pissed up deserve it. I'm just saying that I think there was a lot of commotion and mis-direction on warning women about the dangers of being drugged, convincing them to buy the date rape liquids to put in their drinks etc when it could have concentrated more on reminding them to take responsibility for not getting themselves so utterly destroyed on drink.


The surround sound of a ticking alarm clock

It's amazing really. I can buy a cinema sound processor offering 5:1 digital sound re-creation, pack the room out with standard speakers, a centre speaker, a sub woofer and surround speakers yet if I take my analogue 'ticking' battery operated alarm clock with it's rear speaker that must only measure a centimetre in diameter and place it at the opposite end of the bedroom from my head, the 'surround sound' capabilities of said clock are far greater than my expensive 'rig' at convincing me that it's ticking not more than inch away from my ear.

 

Hitler promoting a super race not modelled on himself

I was chatting with a friend recently and he brought up the interesting observation that for all of Hitler's bluster and rhetoric about the Aryan master-race, a kind of super elite example of German man - tall, blonde, blue eyes, broad shoulders etc - it bore no resemblance to him whatsoever.

Okay, few would have pointed that out to him but most despots seem to think that what they represent is the ideal. I can't imagine Kim Jong Ill acknowledging that his form is not the ideal Korean man or Stalin conceding that there were plenty of better examples of a Russian than himself.

Hell even God apparently created man in his own image yet it seems Hitler displayed a remarkable humility (for want of a better word) in that he believed the best role model for German males, looked and appeared nothing like him.

 

Sharing a moment with a stranger in another car

Most of the time when I'm driving, everybody else is the enemy. They are either trying to cut me up, push in front, be right up my arse or be dawdling along like Miss Daisy. Pedestrians are an annoyance, cyclists a continual pain and motorcyclists for the most part do their own thing.

With everyones 'get ahead' attitude it's no wonder that driving in London makes you feel even more distant from people and society. Other road users are a frustration and many a time have I wished some of them dead.

However there are times when you make a connection with another road user and because of the ever present dismissal of other people, when it happens, it really can pop that miserable cloud balloon and make you think "hey, we are all just people".

I had two recently. One was an incident at a roundabout where a car just sailed across a couple of lanes, blindly cutting another car up. I probably proclaimed him a wanker and then looked across at the car that had been wronged. My eyes locked with the passenger, who was clearly outraged, and I gesticulated with my hand how he'd chopped them up. Her face broke into a smile and we shared a shake of the head.

The other one, and it's happened on more than one occasion, was crawling along in slow moving traffic when a sunshine sheila walked along the pavement. Naturally I craned my neck round to have a good look, as did the driver of the transit that was in the inside lane. As he turned away from checking her out with an appreciative movement of the head, he looked round at me. I smiled back with the knowing smile of men checking out a babe. We both started laughing and he drove off.

I know they are hardly earth shattering but they do serve as a very rare reminder that sometimes it is possible to make a connection with strangers even if very fleetingly.

 

Those that don't think you need to plan a night out

Yes, I can understand some that say the best nights are the unplanned ones. Of course, when you are going from a non event night, something sudden and spontaneous is always going to seem far better. I do however love some peoples desperation that to appear cool and spontaneous they dare not concede to making any form of planning for a night out. I'm not talking planning the assault of a fortified island here, just organising where you will start, what the theme of the night be, what time to move on etc.

So many have to be seen as 'hip' and 'going with the flow party makers' that somehow the mild inference of a little premeditated thought makes them worry that they'll be portrayed as boring and too controlling.

If everyone was like that, you imagine no one would ever go anywhere because they'd all be afraid that committing to something would impair their non committal cool. By 'cracking first' and recommending somewhere else, suddenly their casual, g'o where the party takes me free spiritedness' would have been compromised.

Worse still though are those that when committed to a night (that someone else has organised) make zero effort to get behind it. Every small task or 'ask' of them is a real chore or drag,  gratitude is non-existent, appreciation of the efforts made on their behalf is not noticed and the idea of selflessy getting into the night or making something of it, just isn't within their vocabulary.

 

Ear hair

What possible evolutionary role does that perform?

Why is it deemed necessary to have hair growing from our ears (and our noses) as we get older? Is it some form of in-built population control that our ears and noses become clogged up to the extent that we are less likely to hear or smell the sabre toothed tiger creeping behind us and hence make way for the younger generation.

 

Does shit get smellier as you get older?

Continuing my fascination with toilet matters, here's another.

I understand that to some extent the smell of your dumps has a bearing on what you've actually eaten and digested but as you grow older, does age add another element?

From mine and when I've been unfortunate enough to follow older work colleagues or my step dad into the toilet there is this element of older man acridity to the smell. Like an underlying scent of something old and rotten.

Of course, all shit stinks but when passing through an older model with older pipes and plumbing, does it pick up another element that's old, fusty and a little spicy?

I guess it seems perfectly logical that over time things, namely your guts, will deteriorate in their freshness but I've not seen anywhere near enough studies on it!


BBQ depression

Hit the shops on a sunny Saturday afternoon (like the one just gone) and the feeling that everyone else is out at family barbeques / having fun in the sun really is made remarkably clearly.

The roads are half full, the shops strangely subdued and unless you actually needed burgers or buns you can shop with relaxed ease. The only downside is that when walking to the car you are left feeling like the loneliest, most friendless person in the world.

You have the impression that everyone is in the garden soaking up the sun, laughing and joking with 'new' friends and quaffing back easy alcohol and tasty burgers.

The feeling of isolation is even further compounded by the smell of barbequed meat wafting through the air or people's playful chatter and music just within earshot.

 

Future generations having to find a way

Ok, I confess I'm a little cynical about the whole global warming thing. The data is a little questionable and not as transparent as it should be, there are many vested interests both from fund seeking lobbyists and revenue seeking governments looking for another green tax and with so many previous media fuelled, government sanctioned panics - BSE, Millennium Bug, Bird Flu, Swine Flu etc - it's understandable that scepticism would exist.

Granted I can see the problems of pollution, dwindling resources and over population, However, when I hear so many campaigners dramatically bang on about how we must work now to save the planet for our children and our children's children I can't help but think, "well maybe they'll just have to figure it out for themselves".

Maybe the few that come out of university with science and engineering based degrees rather than media studies or sports science will just have to get their thinking caps on and figure something out. Maybe as our generations have come up with vast civil engineering projects, taking us to the stars (ok, the nearby planets), miniaturising technology and vastly improving telecommunications, they will just have to concentrate on resolving our fuck-ups.

Necessity is a great motivator and when the problem is on your doorstep, humans will deal with it and find a way. Yes, prudence and future planning has it's merits but I think at some point we will have to make some assumptions that future generations will be able or be forced to simply figure it out. 

The only finite certainty with the planet is that it will die in a couple of billion years when the sun expands and then cools. Until then human nature will prevail. It will adapt, it will evolve and it will deal with whatever problems face it. If the seas rise, then people will relocate, if resources run out, they will find alternatives. Man will not meekly accept it's fate and just die out. We can't bequeath future generations a lush utopia or a world without problems. Simply put, they are just going to have to find a way to deal with what happens. 

I think the point I'm making is that we can't be certain what will happen in the future. Even if the climate change/global warming nightmare happens in it's worst case scenario, it's effects will not be immediate. Sea levels will not rise by 10 feet overnight, food will suddenly not just stop (though there's an argument that warmer climates in certain areas could lead to increased food production) and temperatures will not rocket from one week to the next. Future generations will have time to adapt to the problems that present themselves.

Look at Swine Flu. It was apparently going to decimate swathes of people, with individuals in the WHO claiming it could be as bad as the 1917 Influenza. To compensate Govts. around the world spent millions on vaccines, call centres etc. I'm not saying we should have totally ignored it but when the unchecked hysteria grips those right at the top of the 'responsibility' tree, there clearly do need to be times for a little focus and measure.

As I said I'm not saying that we do nothing regarding the environment but if for instance we invest billions in preventing the seas from rising but the actual problem is the sea level falling or everywhere getting colder rather than hotter, we'll have wasted that time and effort once again.

Prudence, future planning and resource management are important but we need to remember that humans are great adapters and over-comers. Put a real problem in front of us and we can tackle it, over come or find a solution. With this gaseous, uncertainty of what the actual problems will be, we should take a little comfort that when the problem manifests itself physically, we will deal with it.

There is a danger that with the cynically emotive "it's for the sake of the children" we all run around like headless chickens haemorrhaging money and wasting time and effort in never ending conferences and quangos trying to resolve problems whose effects/outcomes are uncertain.

 

Not seeing any serious politics until our electorate grows up

Whilst the electorate and population get more stupid and more swayed by idiotic, short term crowd pleasing actions we aren't going to see any serious politics or politicians.

Ian Duncan Smith was a credible, intelligent MP but he was slated for being boring and personality free because he was only really concerned with politics rather than populist antics. Frank Field is another MP who has a lot of sensible ideas and is serious about his craft but once again is virtually ignored for daring to think different things and not being 'street sexy'.

I want to see a return to having some pride in this country. I don't mean that from some bullshit, flag waving jingoism but rather pride in that we are quietly doing the right thing. That we would have our shit in order, that we wouldn't be such a blame dependant, victim culture society, that we wouldn't be so financially screwed and embarrassed on the world stage and that maybe as a country we could just adopt a little self responsibility rather than banging on about our self entitlement and our 'rights' to everything from free childcare to not having to work if we don't want to.

Unfortunately running a tight ship, keeping the books balanced and working towards a long term goal of reducing state involvement in our lives means having sometimes not to be popular but with the short termist views offered by so many what is the point in a politician talking the long game?

What's the point in thinking of the future, the country doesn't care. As long as their leader is watching Coronation Street, sending compassionate letters to footballers that miss penalties and promising to spunk away money that they don't have, they'll be happy.

If I was a politician, I'd want to get out. Sure they've taken a battering over the expenses scandal but when politics has descended into this never ending whirlpool of spin, not admitting your actual opinion for fear of ostracisation and only ever telling people what you think they want to hear, what really is the point?

 

Random observation #57 - Egg yolks

An utterly pointless observation but one nonetheless that I've noticed and feel compelled to comment on.

If I'm cracking an egg into a cup in preparation of frying it, there's usually a 20-25% chance that the yolk will somehow split, indicating you'd think somewhat of a frailty in the yolk and a need to treat them delicately.

Yet chuck 4 or 5 into a measuring jug and beat with a fork for a couple of minutes to make some scrambled eggs and I'm amazed when I find a yolk that is grimly holding on, with it's structural integrity still sound.

Almost like it's some kind of flubber, able to contort round the swirling fork and still keep it's shape or like those water bubbles you'd get when try to mix up some powdered paint in the art lessons at school.

 

Walking at night in the snow

I've got to say that this is always a special experience. If you do it late at night the roads are deserted and the feeling of peace, quiet and isolation as the snow gently falls without sound can almost feel spiritual.


Team GB range

I have to say that for the last few Olympics I've really liked the kits we give our athletes. Vancouver 2010 was no exception.

I love how the designers seem no longer to be afraid to use the Union Jack and the opportunities that the three colours offers. I was watching the Skeleton last night (well done to Rudman & Williams - particularly Williams who is lying 1st after the first two rounds) and the lycra kits they had looked great. Vivid red with union jack 'flashes' on the arms. Even the jackets and hats look great.

I saw the speed skaters a few days back who were virtually all red but then with the back panel all in blue with the Team GB lion emblazoned across it.

For so many years we always seemed to just blend into the background, wary of being overly 'in your face' or appearing too nationalistic. Now we are really distinctive and not afraid to feature our colours. They have a nice balance between honouring the flag and our brand identity but not being too football shirty, if that makes sense.

Even if we aren't doing great in the event, it makes me proud to see how bold and cool we 'represent'.


Windscreen washer roulette

It's always fun this time of year (winter) to play some Winndscreen washer roulette when out driving. You've cleared the screen of ice and are driving along when you feel the need to clear the salt spray/ice/general crap on your windscreen.

You pull the stalk to spray and nothing comes out, meaning that the shit on your windscreen is now smeared across it in some kind of Rorschach pattern making it a little more tricky to see.

If that isn't hilarious enough the real kicker comes in wondering whether it's because you ran out of fluid, there was a blockage or it's just frozen. The 'roll the dice' event comes in holding out for that moment when you hope it's thawed because if you do it again too soon, the windscreen visibility will only get worse.

What can also be funny are the increasingly desperate attempts to get alternative moisture/liquid onto the screen ie spray from a passing lorry, melting ice or snow from the roof etc without having to pull over and directly apply liquid.

I appreciate it's far from earth shatteringly important but it can add a little frisson of peril to your driving experience!


School nativity plays

This isn't one of my usual bitter rants but rather a harmless observation on how amazed I am at the number of parents that I'll talk to whose children only managed to secure the really minor parts in the school nativity play - third star, back half of the donkey, a random shepherd.

I know everyone has a part to play and it's all about inclusion but clearly I must only ever chat to the non pushy parents whose children aren't the ambitious, over achievers fast tracked into the more 'headline' roles of Mary, Joseph or a wise man.

Indeed it seems that the breadth and range of cast opportunities in the lower cast echelons extends to the even more outlandish characters such as one I heard recently who was playing Father Christmas in the nativity play. Top spot for 'far out' characters has to be the son who told his mum that instead of playing a reindeer, he wanted to play a killer whale in the play.


Africa's problems

This doesn't hope to be a complete explanation on Africa but rather my thoughts on some of the reasons for it's problems. Part of the trouble with Africa, and by that I mean the centre and southern states, is that the aid that the Western countries pour in to assuage their colonial guilt is counter productive.

States, even the despotic ones, become increasingly reliant on it as opposed to being forced to fend for themselves with a small amount of guidance and encouragement. The corrupt governments cream the top off any aid that comes in and are happy to let certain parts of their population starve to death.

This then leads to the Kate Aide's, Michael Burke's and Bob Geldof's compiling heart breaking reports or mobilising massive charity drives.

Over time though the public becomes anaesthetised to the horror and suffering they see on the TV, charitable donations are not as free flowing and empathy fatigue and cynicism begin to creep in.

When you see Lenny Henry saying "your money will bring change to this area" and not being sure whether it's from the 80's, 90's or 00's, it's only natural to start thinking 'are we making a difference or do we need a complete rethink'.

South Africa is an interesting example of what can happen to some parts of Africa. Yes it's easy to glibly say that when the blacks took over it went to shit. I'm not trying to say that or am I agreeing with apartheid, but SA was long considered the jewel of southern Africa. Rich in minerals, gold, fertile land, tourism and trade.

Despite the intolerable regime of apartheid, it was a stable economy and perversely despite the 'second class' treatment that blacks would receive, the barbed wire and minefields along SA's borders were to stop more blacks coming in as opposed to preventing them from fleeing their white oppressors.

People don't like to talk negatively of today's SA but things aren't great there and tribal friction still plays a part. You had a vice president who had allegations of rape and corruption (nice combination for a potential leader) made against him and was sacked by the then president to only then be allowed to eventually lead the country.

You have a police force whose Chief is recommending a 'shoot to kill' policy, murders averaging 50 a day, carjacking's 39 a day and rapes 130 a day, business and house robberies rocketing, members of the population arming themselves to protect from car jacking and one visiting team to the World Cup being recommended to wear bullet proof vests if they venture away from the hotel.

Now I'm not saying that this consigns the whole of Africa to the bin but it is interesting that SA appears to be sliding from the 1st world (despite it's appalling civil rights) into the 2nd world or 3rd world and no one wants to discuss the reasons why.

The infrastructure, transport, technology etc were all in place yet it seems (at the moment) to be going to the dogs. I know many will say that I'm basically being a racist and saying that the blacks screw everything up. I'm not but I would like to know:

a. The reason why

b. Why no one is discussing the reasons.


The BNP appearing on BBC's Question Time

It was interesting television and if it makes people talk more about politics and the issues that dissatisfy many including myself such as unchecked immigration, erosion of British culture and further European integration, then it isn't a bad thing.

I agree he didn't perform well and I certainly don't agree with many of his views but as others have said all the panellists were lining up to quote and hammer him down, which really isn't what Question Time is meant to be about.

If you want to tear him down or analyse his questionable opinions then he should go 'one on one' with the likes of Andrew Marr, John Humphreys or Jeremy Paxman.

If you pull him onto a political debating show, such as QT, then there should be a range of questions that the panellists answer.

In a way I wish he had performed better because when you have a politician that is so reviled it almost 'frees' you to say the things that any approval seeking politician wouldn't say. ie commenting on the negative and demeaning attitude that militant Islam has to women.

There are so many points that could be discussed in further detail that this post could go on forever:

Griffin's former denial of the holocaust, the commentary on the war & Churchill, the fact that blacks and asians fought with us during the war but that this was more down to their belonging of the Commonwealth which I believe is regularly vilified as being our unpleasant colonial past, the Springer style audience 'whooping' when a blow was landed against Griffin and the very surprising clapping that he received on some points, the talk of not trusting Nick when few people seem to trust any politician, Jack Straw's refusal to acknowledge that Labours piss poor handling of immigration had contributed to the increase of the BNP's support, the hypocrisy of slating Nick for talking deals with Libya (how is that "near death" Libyan getting on), the audience member commenting on not liking to be called afro-caribbean, Griffin's attempt to modernise the party to make them electable not being that dis-similar from Old Labour suppressing the union influence and re-branding itself as New Labour and many, many others.

Ultimately, many people have called for a 'frank and open' debate on race and immigration. Indeed the last proper one we seemed to have was with Enoch Powell as so many pundits seem to go on about it.

If his appearance on QT means that more people start debating, arguing and actually thinking about political issues then the BNP in a way could have done politics a favour.


Stephen Gateley's death

When you consider how fevered the press were about identifying the cause of Michael Jackson's death and even sourcing pictures of the bedroom where he died, the lack of coverage on the cause or final moments of Gateley, seems surprising and strange.

I'm sorry to hear that he died but you do wonder of the lack of speculation or investigation is down to society at last learning to respect those that have passed away or that on this occasion people are dissuaded from asking questions for fear of painting a negative picture?

I know they said that his family had a history of weak heart conditions to explain his pulmonary oedema but this is a guy who used to deal with the stress and exertions of performing on stage. What was he doing that night that would have caused more strain than that? If a reasonably healthy man can die on his sofa from natural causes, maybe the govt should start warning people about some new epidemic. I mean I occasionally doze off on the sofa late at night. Am I at risk?

More than likely he'd been on the sauce and choked on his own vomit, which is another way of describing a pulmonary oedema. This would be fine but his neighbours and Louis Walsh claim that he hardly ever drinks and everyone seems to be at lengths to indicate that he has no vices. Of course it's not vital that I know the reasons why but I'm curious to understand why the tabloids aren't clambering to find out.

The other point about him being married is what Jan Moir in the Mail was trying to talk about but has been hammered by the gay lobby and their outraged indignation.

If 'civil partnerships' want to be accorded the same standing both legally and in society's eyes as heterosexual marriages, then they should expect the same kind of disapproval or questions to be asked that would be meted out if the same had occurred in a hetero marriage.

i.e. Husband and wife go out one night and pick up a woman who they return to the apartment with. Next morning the wife is found dead on the sofa whilst the husband is in bed with the new woman he'd just met.

In the Gateley case this seemed to be treated as if it was perfectly normal but clearly it isn't. I'm not saying I disapprove of gay marriages but why would eyebrows be raised in a hetero marriage but the matter be 'glossed over' in a civil one?

And that's the hypocrisy. Whereas we are prepared to tear apart the details of Jackson's death or look under the microscope at Jude Law's heterosexual love life we are denied or encouraged not to look too much at the proclivities of homosexuals.

I haven't got a problem with homosexuality before people start screaming 'homophobic'. It's a sexual preference and it's up to the individual but when people endlessly campaign for equality, that equality should apply to both the positive AND negative aspects of being in the public spotlight.


Being passive / aggressive

I've increasingly noticed this statement being used against people and their written grievances. The accusation has been derisorily levelled at me before and it makes me wonder, what would you then prefer?

Yes, I'm angry or irked by something and I'm trying to convey that within the confines of remaining polite, lucid and using correct grammar and language. Would you prefer that my comment descended into F and C bombs? Should it be purely aggressive with no passive tempering?


The demise of Reef

I like Reef. Both the Orange one and the even rarer Red one but the war on alcopops and their

apparent destruction of the fabric of society has forced them from both the supermarkets and now even the pubs. I'm sorry to see them go.

It's lunacy really. I mean why are they considered so bad yet going for a cocktail or a vodka & orange, brandy & coke are somehow different. Aren't they also sweetened alcohol?

I've got a sweet tooth and don't like wine or lager but because some real ale swilling MP twat hasn't drunk one, they've been consigned to the bin.


People who say they come from Persia

This isn't a rant at Iranian people but more about those who say they come from Persia. I've noticed it creeping into conversation more and more.

Now I know technically the country can be called that but the reality is that the indigenous people have referred to their country as Iran for over a 1,000 years and the name became the official international name in 1935. Hence why you won't find it on any map.

I don't know if it's because they are embarrassed of it or fear that the uneducated will label them 'suicide bombing, raghead fundamentalists' but saying Persia with its romantic connotations of exotic tents and rolled up rugs only makes it worse because people have to then double check with a "where's that?" to which I assume the reply comes back "Iran".

Few people say they come from Rhodesia anymore and that changed it's name to Zimbabwe in 1980 so I don't see why the need for the pretentious backward step? It's like me introducing myself as "Hi, I'm from Britannia"


"Wish I could get back those minutes…"

I do chuckle when I read or hear people say "I wish I could get back those minutes or time that I wasted reading something online, watching that TV programme etc"

There is nothing wrong with regretting doing things but I'd hardly say that your minutes are that important that the world will suffer from you not using them productively. Really, what use would you have actually put those minutes to if you hadn't been reading, surfing or watching?

If you are the kind of person that likes to amble around the net or flick through the TV channels, I doubt that you are some kind of genius who could have used the 'wasted' time to discover the cure for cancer or researched a clean and infinite power source.

 

Toilet Duck fresh discs

Top marks to Toilet Duck for coming up with these.

An easy to use applicator with no need to touch the toilet bowl, does the same job and then over time just dissolves away without the need for the piss catching plastic cradle which always seems to remain for a couple of weeks before you get round to cautiously removing it.


"What would you do if you heard the 4 minute warning?"

This topic might only relate to the older readers and it isn't necessarily seeking an answer to the question (though feel free to answer) but rather an observation on the demise of the question.

In the 80's when the threat of nuclear holocaust seemed more real, aided by the likes of Threads and The Day After, it appeared to be a regular question to elicit an indication of ones deepest thoughts/desires that could be unleashed in some final moment frenzy.

It's interesting how that kind of quicker, more immediate fear of everything ending has been replaced by a slower paced catastrophe. I guess it was a unique event because it was something that we could receive advance notice of but only enough notice to do something pretty limited and rather basic ie strip off your clothes, snog a passing stranger or dance with tears in your eyes.

Now instead of questions on how you'd react if you had the knowledge that you were going to lose everything, a question at the opposite end of the spectrum "what would you do if you won the lottery" ie won everything seems to be more prevalent.

Although the world might be a more dangerous place now and the threat of nuclear conflict has not completely gone away, it's interesting to see that a couple of cold war peace treaties could help remove some after dinner Armageddon banter.

Oh and for those interested in what I'd do. It's a toughie isn't it? 4 minutes is not a great deal of time and in all likelihood you'd probably be at work or never in the ideal location. Add to that, 4 minutes won't give you time to get anywhere.

Personally I'd like to be in the company of my brother as he's the dearest person to me. In the absence of that or the ability to call him, I don't believe that even with the missiles en route that I'd be able to secure a shag. Who's to say she hasn't eyes for someone else or is trying to contact relatives?

No, mine would have to be controllable. Glass of Baileys with ice, skip forward 3 minutes into Comfortably Numb live and let that bomb fall. 


Cautionary warnings that sum up our 'nannying' society

With the need to classify everything and provide cautionary warnings to protect everyone, I have to laugh whenever I see the cautionary guideline for a film that says

"contains scenes of mild peril"

What exactly is mild peril? You're in danger but not really? Is that like if you are reading a book that you run the risk of sustaining a nasty paper cut or more being chased down a tunnel by a huge boulder that's made of cotton wool? Apparently the new Harry Potter film is advertised as containing "sustained mild peril"

Others I've seen include "contains emotionally intense scenes" or "contains mild language"

Surely the age certification is enough without adding another sub level of cautionary analysis. In 5 years will it get to films needing a minute by minute break down of the potentially shocking and intense scenes?

I guess with the likes of sleeping tablets having to say that they "may cause drowsiness" it exists in many other fields. Anymore you can think of?


Bringing babies into work

It used to happen at one of the first places I worked. All the women would gather around staring, making baby sounds and asking if they could hold it.

I used to think it would be funny if one of the guys brought in his babe and all the men gathered round and did the same.


Writing in a birthday card

How come you can make conversation with someone for like 8 hours a day but pop a birthday card down for you to fill in for the same person and you can't think of anything remotely interesting or funny to say?

It's like when someone hands you a helium balloon, you take a big drag and then your mind loses the ability to think of any words to speak despite shouted encouragement to "say anything".


Where I'd want to be in the event of a Zombie holocaust

I love England but in the event of a zombie apocalypse I'd much rather be in the US. Greater access to a far wider range of weaponry, military spec equipment and some serious utility vehicles.

Massive malls, lots of space, plenty of roads, different scenery and terrain and considerably more slow moving un-deads to slaughter. Naturally in this utopia there'd be a regular supply of honeys that needed rescuing and I'd never get an inconvenient toothache or illness!


Jeremy Kyle

I don't watch his show but having seen a review of it on another programme last night where they virtually described him as the anti-Christ, I have to ask who is worse?

Kyle for gaining fame, or infamy, from showcasing individual's chavness and the lows they'll stoop to, to get on the TV.

The participants, who if in the main weren't so wretched or happy to be demeaned, wouldn't give Kyle the material for his show and make for such car crash TV.

Or the viewers for watching it and providing the audience for it to perpetuate?


The increasing use of the letter Z in the new generation

It's amazing how much exposure and usage the letter Z is now getting in this age of texting, twittering and instant messaging.

"Laterz, cuz, woz and howz" to name a few.

You'd think that as a letter it must be delighted. There it was, consigned to the end of the alphabet and nearly forgotten yet with the 'lazy' (see what I did there) generation it seems to be getting into words and sentences that it couldn't have ever dreamed of getting into.


Michael Jackson

I've always wanted to write something about Michael on my site but I've never been sure where to start. How could I contain what could become a rambling monologue (that is my site I guess!) How could I summate what I loved and also defend the numerous shit and accusations that was flung at him? Could I write something that would get across my thoughts? I guess his passing has been the catalyst for me doing something.

I have an internet friend who shares a similar appreciation for the man and his talent and had also got tickets to see him in concert. She wrote to me after his death knowing that I would understand where her head was at. My response started out normal enough and then became this outpouring that managed to put in words my respect, frustrations and thoughts on him. If it's ok with you guys I'll use this as my thoughts and tribute to him.

When the news first came out it didn't really sink in with me. I'd literally just returned from holiday and hence the concerts still didn't quite feel real if you know what I mean. It's a terrible shame that he's passed away but in a way I'm relieved that we won't have to endure another 20 years of crowd pleasing twats and mis-informed media continually slating and hounding him.

I'm sure the media will turn on him soon enough but at least at the moment he is getting the huge respect he so richly deserves. You know it is remarkable when you consider that Thriller generated 7 number one hits and it's not even a compilation album AND it was from a time when you couldn't guarantee a number one like the produced/manufactured groups do nowadays. I heard a story that I'd never heard before of how after he'd finished performing Billie Jean at the Grammys, when he first revealed the moonwalk, how Fred Astaire called him up and told him that was the best dancing he'd ever seen.

What amazing talent that you could excel in the field of music, yet also be so talented in the field of dance that someone like Astaire would call you up and tell you that.

It's such a shame that he was surrounded by so few people that he could genuinely trust or that everyone seemed to want a piece of him. With the incredible media exposure and coverage is it any wonder he had eccentricities. But then again what's wrong with being eccentric? I mean, when I first saw the Elephant Man, it hugely affected me. I mean massively. If I'd had the unlimited funds that MJ had and I had seen the skeleton going to auction I would have bought it just to make sure it was safe. If I had huge amounts of money, I'd build rollercoasters in my grounds. He earned the money. He didn't exploit anyone, steal it or even win by pure chance. No, he earnt it by entertaining, enthralling and bringing joy to millions, so what he does with his money is entirely up to him and no one else.

I know a friend saw a programme which talked about how sometimes a lot of the 'wacko' stories were put out by MJ's PR people just to continue the exposure and interest. I remember the baloney about him sleeping in an oxygen tent but this seemed to stem from him visiting a childrens burns hospital where children slept in oxygen tents to help aid the regeneration of their skin. To make them feel at ease he apparently said how if he'd slept in one he imagined he'd sleep for hours. A photographer then asked for a pic of him inside the tent with one of the kids and bang, there's your unfounded but sensationalist story.

It's hard to reconcile how some people could either be so gormless, stupid or hypocritical when slagging off Michael. It's like they swallow all the shit the media says without any independent thought or reason. Like how they are happy to enjoy his music and dancing but willing to slate him at the first opportunity to make themselves seem funny in front of insignificant people. And their arguments are always so weak and never up to rebuttal.

"Jacko's wierd" - why is he?

"Well by having all that plastic surgery" - Well loads of people have surgery, whats wrong with that?

"What about him changing his skin colour" - Well who cares if he does. He did a song about it not mattering whether he's black or white. If we all claim to be living in this racially harmonious society, what difference does his skin colour make? He could be yellow, black, white or green. His blood is still red and he's still a human

"he fiddles with kids" - No, he doesn't and when it was taken to court it was proved beyond reasonable doubt that he did.

"he's broke and keeps spending money" - So are govts and countries around the world so what difference does it make.

It's just that most of the people that slate don't have the resolve or the intellect to stick up for someone. They just want to pander to the masses and appear hip and cool by slagging off an easy target. Unless you can say I don't like MJ and I don't listen to his music (like I do of Mick Hucknall) then these people are spineless hypocrites.

It's why I couldn't stand Uri Geller or Martin Bashir. Uri is a freeloading wanker who used, and is now using, a tentative knowledge of MJ to wrap himself up in him. He deserted him when the trial was on and seeing him come out of the woodwork now makes me want to repeatedly hit his stupid, smug face with a baseball bat.

As for Bashir, he was a second rate hack looking for another sensationalist story after his Diana exclusive. There were many things that pissed me off about him but his interview technique is like designed for the most stupid of viewer.

Bashir (spoken slow, deliberate and over earnestly) - Did your father beat you?

Michael - Yes, he beat me

Bashir (leaning forward and attempting to add more contrived sincerity) - So, you are telling me that your father beat you?

Yes Martin, I've got it, we've all got it, the audience has taken onboard the point. Michael couldn't have made it clearer. You don't need to repeat the point for your sensationalist bravado, you gormless prick.

If I like someone I'll defend them. I do it with Tom Cruise and I did it with Michael. When his trial was going on I used to have huge rows with people on internet forums trying to argue the reasons. It's like how there was always an assumption of guilt when he paid off the first family in the allegations. If you had that much money and a forthcoming concert tour wouldn't you just pay the money for them to go away? I mean maybe in hindsight he should have fought it to prove his innocence but why should he? I thought the law rested on innocent until proven guilty, not vice versa.

It was always amazing that he was condemned yet if the other family were 100% certain that he was a paedophile, why did they take the money and continue to let a criminal go free. If MJ was guilty, why weren't they villified for taking the money and running when they should have put away this apparent monster?

Just another example of people wanting to exploit others. I don't believe MJ had any ill intentions to children. He was an innocent man who enjoyed the non-accusational innocence of children who weren't trying to fuck him over like so many adults did. I also disliked this constant assumption that because he was an adult male it seemed to automatically assume that he couldn't be left alone with kids. Why? I remember at the time being an estate agent and letting a large house to a family that had a male nanny. Would the world assume that because the nanny was a bloke that he would be touching the kids!!!

It's like how everyone had to comment negatively on him not wanting to show the faces of his children. Well surely people could understand that. He didn't want his children hounded in the same way he was and thus wanted to protect their anonymity until they wanted or wished to reveal themselves. Of course to everyone else this was wrong but to me, made perfect sense. Demeaningly put a woman in a burka to hide her from the outside world and that's deemed okay because no one dare slate the religion and its chauvenistic connatations. If Michael does something similar purely as a means to protect his children and he's ridiculed.

When I reflect on it Michael left a huge mark on the world. He wrote some great songs, he did some great work for charity (which is often overlooked) and raised the bar on what skills/talent you would really need if you wanted to dominate the pop world.

For this reason a part of me thinks that maybe he is in a better place. You can't help but wonder what perception he had of the world when he had to be guarded with so many people for fear that they would simply exploit/betray him for a couple of bucks.

It will be a real shame to not see him. I would have queued and waited for hours just to see him come out for Billie Jean, dip his hat, do the moonwalk and head off. I'm not saying that as some kind of obsessed fan but rather that I was prepared to go and show my support and appreciation rather than demanding to be entertained. Does that make sense?

Finally what Michael needs or deserves now isn't the showey, overly dramatic outpourings of grief that you see on the TV of people outside Neverland. That, I believe, isn't what he wanted. For me, showing my respect and admiration, is down to purely looking on him as the best, the greatest and the most influential and iconic music/pop star there has ever been.

A smile in the mind and warming of the heart is how I will always pay my respects to the man.

 

The common assumption that Spartans were gay

Just out of interest how do we know this? I know people make the simple assumption and an assortment of vases with pictures of them with their cocks out helps but is there any 'hard' evidence of this or have the Spartans just been adopted as being gay?

Literary evidence of that time frame is a little, shall we say, thin on the ground so have we just filled in the blanks and let the gay lobby adopt them? The stories of those times talk a lot about Gods etc yet we seem happy to dismiss these easily enough yet the homosexuality angle prevails.

In 50 years time will people review Top Gun and say 'here is the conclusive evidence that almost every US Navy pilot was homosexual'.

 

Personal achievement yes, but not a newsworthy national event

I appreciate this makes me sound like a misery but you've probably gleaned that already! However I do tire of seeing people's personal but not ground breaking achievements making the news.

We recently had Ranulph Fiennes celebrating his ascendancy up Mt Everest with a BBC film crew waiting at the base camp to interview him on his return. OK, it's high but really it's just a mountain and over 2,700 people have now gone up it since 1953.

Climbing equipment is so impressive nowadays that I honestly think I could do that with a little training and a lot of money ($25,000 per permit). They don't just pull up in a car and go for a Sunday hike. These expeditions have all the latest gear and technology and then a bevy of local Sherpas to carry all your crap up the mountain. So, you stick your head out of your storm proof tent and it's a whiteout. Just eat another energy par, snuggle down in your battery warmed socks and try again in another 4 hours.

When we've had men walking in the vacuum of space and on the surface of the moon, getting to the top of the biggest mountain with state of the art equipment just isn't that earth shattering anymore.

I mean Ranulph's:

  • Not the first or the last to climb it

  • Not the youngest - Girl of 15

  • Not the eldest - Man of 76

  • Not the most frequent - Sherpa has done it 19 times

  • Not the least able - Blind man

  • Not the most quirky - Couple have got married on the summit

So why does it need to be on the news?

In 2008 China carried the Olympic torch up and over the summit for the Olympic Torch relay with 19 climbers completing the final leg. They've even conquered Everest so much that a nearby mobile phone mast will give you network coverage all the way to the top.

Now I'm not saying that it isn't still dangerous and isn't an impressive feat but I do think the time has arrived for it to move from a newsworthy national event to a proud but personal achievement.

It's like that woman who was taking a yacht around the British Isles. Her thing was that she was paralysed from the neck down and operated the boat from a series of pipes that she either blew or sucked on. When pushed on how she would eat, go to the toilet etc, she said that the support ship that always followed behind would take care of those things.

Now I sympathise with her ailment but frankly it's the designer of the boat that should be getting the glory because she's not really filling the dizzying headline of "paralysed woman single-handedly sails around Britain" is she? I mean if she was sliding around pulling up the sails with her teeth and steering with her nose then that would be amazing but really, she's strapped to the Knight Rider yacht.

It's like if you were to read in a newspaper "Blind man flies plane" but then read the smaller text about how the autopilot was on at the time or how he just held the controls whilst the plane cruised in level flight, you'd rightly think well maybe that's not so impressive or as amazing as the misleading headline would have me believe.

We just seem to be bombarded with an ever increasing deluge of ridiculously pointless yet uniquely specific quests. The first one legged blonde that rowed across the channel in a blue jumper or the oldest child that cycled backwards to Edinburgh. How soon before the first completely dead person circumnavigates the globe?

There's nothing wrong with personal achievement but unless you are going to dazzle me with a human that can actually fly like a bird or swim across the Pacific Ocean on one breath, then please just stop over publicising these fruitless and ultimately pointless quests.


TV adverts for online poker sites

I have to laugh whenever I see a TV advert for these multitude of online poker sites. The very things they highlight that are meant to be so great about playing poker such as the venue, the atmosphere, the diverse range of players, the reading of peoples body language and the dramatic throw downs/celebrations are the very things missing when you play online.

I know advertising is about selling a dream but even the most delusional will see the difference between playing online in your pyjamas on a wet Tuesday evening in Penge and strolling into the Bellagio with your 10 gallon hat, dark shades, cowboy boots and a cheerleader on each arm.


Colourful names of famous people that you enjoy saying

I appreciate that this is a little random but there are just some really interesting names that sound great when rolling off the tongue. I'm not ridiculing the people but rather commenting on how much they stick in your mind when you hear them pronounced.

I've always enjoyed getting into conversation the Iranian politician, Ali Akbar Rafsanjani, the Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu though my favourite was the former Secretary General of the UN, Boutros Boutros-Ghali.

A good friend of mine used to like saying the BBC journalist, Rageh Omaar but his current favourite is the Zimbabwean PM, Morgan Changerai (Tsvangirai)

Does anyone else have any?

 

People preserving their body once they've died

I was reading more about this recently and it does make you wonder how much they think about it.

Ok, each to their own but don't they understand that in all likelihood they will die of old age. Hence if any technology does exist in the future to bring them back it won't do so as some sprightly, virile 25 year old but rather some wrinkled, demented, bed wetting, geriatric fool. I know you could have tons of plastic surgery but most of your joints would have worn down and your ears will be massive.

They might be able to restart you by passing a current through your corpse but they aren't going to be able to reverse time or ageing and with an ever expanding global population, will they really be needed?

Who decides when the time is right to bring you back? You won't be able to, the people who signed the deal will be dead and you can't expect your great, great, great grand kids (that's if you have any) to keep a watching brief on your frozen corpse?

Would there really be a time when it would be more financially viable to defrost you and spend all that money rejuvenating you as opposed to just collecting the yearly storage rent. It's like buying plots of land on the moon, utterly pointless and if they are stupid enough to be conned into doing so, will we really need that IQ back in the gene pool?

 

The law needing to protect people when defending/protecting their home

It's all very well when liberal minded people from the comfort of their armchair or office pass judgement on civilians defending themselves by saying "if the burglar was moving away from you or not attacking you, then you have to wait".

In the heat of the moment, your heart is pounding and your mind is racing. You don't know what this person's intentions are. Burglars don't wear eye masks and black 'n' white stripy jumpers so as not to mistaken for murderers and rapists.

All you know is that they have crossed your boundaries, broken the law and you don't know what their limitations are. You don't engage in "are you an opportunist cat burglar or do you mean me serious harm" conversations. Your over-riding concern is that of protecting your family and possessions.

Somebody moving away from you could easily turn around, be running to grab a weapon or trying to alert others. I don't agree with vigilantism but the law needs to reflect, or be changed to reflect, that the action of defending your home and family takes priority over those attacking/invading it.

As someone once said if you step outside the law, then you can't expect the law to protect you.

 

What trucks do you acknowledge to ease the boredom of a long journey

I used to be an Eddie Stobart man. I'd pull alongside on the motorway and try to give them a toot, which to their credit they would always respond with a flash of the lights. Trouble is that it could be hard to see this. If you were moving alongside them on a motorway, how would they see it was you, the person in front or behind might be a little confused and you wouldn't see the truck drivers response.

Hence with this, and the change in branding which I didn't like, I began to move away from acknowledging their presence on the road. Now the only ones I welcome and this is only by loudly uttering their name in the car rather than signalling my appreciation are the red and white liveried lorries of Norbert Dentressangle.


Chris Rock

I watched Chris Rock's latest stand up show last night 'Kill the Messenger'. Now I like Chris and I think he's funny but christ does he labour his jokes. He makes some funny comments and observations but manages to have only about 15 that he economically uses to fill an hour and a half show.

He gives you the lead up where he tells you what he's going to say, then says it again and then says it again. Then he gives you the line, another example and then another example and then gives you the line again.

Now I don't know if his delivery is a result of the intelligence of his audience but you just want to say "Yes Chris, I've got the joke, there's no need to keep endlessly repeating it. Hit me with another". If Lee Evans worked on the same principle his shows would be about 5 hours long.

It seems his audience as well as being desperate to make it onto the show with their ever increasingly ridiculous and overblown laughing reactions are also incredibly slow witted. They just can't seem to see the obvious conclusion to his jokes/observations, even when he telegraphs it to them. It's almost like they are pre-programmed to laugh or whoop/holler at anything he says without keeping up with his train of conscious or thinking where he is going.

Case in point was when he was going on about George Bush.

"George Bush does not give a f*ck, he doesn't give a f*ck about anything, he just does not give a f*ck. If you were standing on the edge of a cliff and he was standing there with a pocket full of f*cks and all you needed was a f*ck to survive, he wouldn't give you one. He wouldn't give you one because George Bush does not give a f*ck"

Now it was only at the dropping of that very final sentence when they showed an audience member who looked like they'd had an electric shock passed through the chair, jumping up and down with hilarity and amazement, as he'd just got it.

I wouldn't say I'm overly intelligent but sweet Jesus, I didn't need to hear the very final sentence before I understood the joke.

Like I say, I do like him but his shows can feel very drawn out and long winded with the constant repeating and milking of his jokes. Maybe this is proof of British humour being quicker and how maybe we prefer being made to laugh, then followed quickly with another joke and then another in quick succession to keep us "rolling along".


What I think of Barack Obama

I first became aware of Barack about two years ago when The Today Show with Jon Stewart did a piece on how CNN had accidentally called him Barack Osama Hussein in a broadcast. I was impressed how Barack dismissed it with a comment along the lines of admitting that it was a tricky name and had taken no offence. 

I then saw him be interviewed on the show and really warmed to his confident, easy and humorous disposition. From this I tracked down his influential speech at the 2004 Democratic Party conference when he talked about Red and Blue states. It was hugely impressive, written with common sense, hope and humour and all delivered with inspiring gusto. Here it is

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eWynt87PaJ0

I went into 'sponge mode' and the more I learnt and read, the more impressed with him I became.

I didn't look at him as black or mixed race but rather simply being a very credible, driven, intelligent man who was offering something new. He had a hard working mentality and his history demonstrated that he wasn't afraid to get his hands dirty. 

During his campaign for the Democratic nomination against Hilary I thought he handled himself brilliantly. His answers were always measured and thoughtful, he never lost his temper, humour or composure and in my eyes was head and shoulders above Hilary.

This was echoed in his handling of his presidential campaign. He always seemed to do the right and sensible thing. When his grandmother was ill he went and saw her, during the TV debates he was cool and composed and didn't rise to any digs that he might have received. Even his part funding by public donation was inspired and I gave serious thought to contributing. 

I always knew he would be president and thus his victory came as no surprise. For me he was just miles ahead of any other candidate whether Hilary Clinton or John McCain. I love America but if they couldn't see this I just wouldn't understand it.

He has an air of importance and magnetism to his persona that you can feel that he's the real deal. He might not be my president but I think in his presence you would still feel the greatness and the respect. 

His win is historic but it does need to be remembered that he is of mixed race. I don't blame him but when the media bangs on about him being the first Black president, but he is of mixed race, white and black which couldn't be more relevant in today's multi race society. He didn't get where he has because of his black heritage or his white. It was because of his ambition, his drive, his hard working attitude and the support of his family, which primarily was his mother and grandmother.

When black voters talk of how they were motivated to vote for him, and never had before, it does make me despair that they basically are saying that they only voted for him because of his colour, which is no different to the prejudice that they accuse white voters of having. I'm sure Barack would prefer that he had secured votes because of who he was rather than what he was. 

Martin Luther King talked of having a dream that his children would be judged on the content of their character rather than the colour of their skin. When commentators reference him, his dream and Barack's win, I think they miss the point. It should be judged that the best man became president for who he was and not because of his colour. That he didn't secure the black vote because he was black but because he was the right candidate. If we want to honour Martin Luther's dream then Barack's colour should always be secondary.

Personally I think it's great that he has been elected. It couldn't more clearly demonstrate the American dream that anyone, with the right dedication, can become the President. I do feel that the US, and the world, has the chance of becoming a better place with him helping to shape it.

 

People's one upmanship when it comes to Christmas dinner

I do have to laugh at people when they seem intent on trying to out do others when talking about their Christmas dinners.

If its not enough that they are desperate to impress with the amount of different meats that they intend to serve "Just having Turkey, oh no I'm having Turkey, Ham, Chicken and Beef" now it's with the exclusivity of meat "Just having a Taste the Difference Turkey, oh no I'm having hand fed Austrian Turkey, small lobed Pheasant, Armenian Gammon and Guatemalan Duck"

Mention an enjoyment of a pig in blanket or eating the Turkey skin and they literally shake with revulsion at your lower class!

 

Changing my mind about people

I know I'm pretty judgemental and have black and white opinions on people. There are some people that I will stoically defend because I like them or because I rail against the popular mood to slag them off ie Tom Cruise or Michael Jackson. Or there are people that I utterly despise such as Piers Morgan or Boy George. 

I do still try and maintain an open mind to these people meaning that on occasion I can even change my mind. Yes the knee jerk, opinionated arse is capable of change. Here's two examples.

George W Bush: I did for some time try and defend him. In a way I felt everyone was slating him as a means to slating America which does sometimes piss me off. Everyone is entitled to dislike a country, hell I do of France, but I don't like people's hypocrisy in labelling all of America as dumb and then enjoying so many elements of their culture. 

Hence when 9/11 happened and everyone derided him for his reaction, I attempted to defend. Even after Katrina I tried to answer the criticisms of his inaction on having to following State government protocol. Ultimately though I had to concede that he's not a very good president and have seriously damaged both the office of the presidency and also that of the image of the USA. One of the reasons why I think Barack will be such a force for good.

Stephen Fry: Here's a man that I never liked. I concede that he is an extremely intelligent, articulate man but I felt he used his superior intellect to dismiss those beneath him with contempt. He seemed so stuffy and wooden with no humility or consideration to his personality. P used to defend him and say that he was funny and self deprecating on QI but although I listened, I did not believe.  

I've recently been watching his tour of America programme on BBC1 and I've been very impressed with him. I thought he would be deriding the Americans with sneering contempt and pompous British arrogance but far from it. I've read him saying that they couldn't be more friendly and polite and how he'd feel far more comfortable knocking on a strangers door for help in the US rather than the UK.

When he has come across things he doesn't enjoy, like the dancing in Florida, it would have been very easy to label those doing that activity as silly or senile but he described them as sweet and didn't take the cheap easy shot. He would have been the last person that I would have believed to have got the US but it seems he did. The final most telling thing that he did though was when at a US football college game. He was amazed at the amount of effort that had gone into was what simply a derby between two local colleges. The game had a huge crowd, cheerleaders, marching bands and even a fighter jet fly by which left him speechless. When he turned to the camera to express wonder at the crazy, mad, largesse of the American people he did so with his eyes misty with tears.  

Just like I had been when watching the closing ceremony of Cedar Point with it's singing of the anthem and patriotism or witnessing Illuminations on the World Showcase at Epcot he had clearly been humbled by the American people in exactly the same way I had. He is a man that I now respect and appreciate and would like to meet, though I do think he would think me a fool.

 

The pleasure of killing a mosquito or midge after it's been feeding on you

There must be few things more satisfying or primeval than 'taking out' a mossie after it's been chowing down on you.

You've been asleep and you either start scratching or hear that occasional but irritating buzzing that tells you that something has been feeding on you. So it's up and on with the lights whilst you quickly try to transform your dreary eyes into those of a movement detecting hawk. You curse the items of dark furniture or wall coverings that you have in the room which help it to keep 'cloaking' like the predator as it moves in front of them.

It becomes a man vs. beast battle as you try different tactics like switching on and off the lights to dis-orientate it but only end up screwing up your own vision. Then suddenly you spot it. Do you use your hand for the killer blow or try to grab an implement giving it the chance to disappear again?

As you get closer, the importance of knowing that you have to kill it first time grows in your mind. You're tired and you still might be able to get to sleep again but if you miss it, it will be 'spooked' and go to ground meaning it could take even longer to find and there's no way you'll be able to get off knowing that it's still buzzing around the room.

Your hand, or the implement, becomes a praying mantis. You feel yourself loading up the tension in your wrist and forearm so that you can explode in a flash of speed like a coiled cobra. Miss it and the defeat is crushing but get it and you feel like a proud warrior that's defended a town of small blind children. It might be late but you still have to cry out a muted 'Come on….!!'

The sense of victory is even more intoxicating if you can tell from its carcass that there is blood which is clearly yours.

"Oh you liked my blood did you? Good, because it was the last thing you enjoyed before I smashed your fuckin' brain through your face and onto my wall" Sometimes I might even leave the destroyed remains on the wall for the remainder of the night as a warning to any other flying mofos.

 

Cashing a lottery winning cheque in the current Oct 08 financial crisis

Granted this hasn't happended to me so I'm hardly in a position to grumble but it is an amazing state of affairs that if you were to win a good few million on the lottery you would need to think carefully where you cashed it.

I'm not talking about your eventual investments but rather where it's initially deposited. Imagine if you'd won £60 million on the euro lottery and then stuck it with a bank/building that could only offer a £50,000 guarantee return.

Again I appreciate facing this kind of 'dilemma' is all pie in the sky and hence I'm not taking it seriously but it would be interesting if Camelot handed you a huge cheque and you said "would you mind holding on to it for me until I'm sure where I can put it thats 100% safe".

 

Gordon Browns recent decisions Oct 08

Yeah nice one Gordon. Firstly you put Peter Mandelson back into the cabinet for his third attempt at office whilst massaging his ego that he's great for business. What so great that whilst head of the Department of Trade & Industry he didn't think it worth declaring that the businessman his department were investigating, Geoffrey Robinson, had privately lent him some money? I mean this couldn't represent a conflict of interest surely?

And then brilliantly when we are facing a little economic downturn and money should be a little tight, Gordon decides to create a whole new department for climate change. Right so they won't need new offices, stationery and staff to run this bureaucratic, red tape snooping department will they?

What was wrong, pray tell, with using a couple of people in the existing Department of the Environment? No, let's spunk some money on another useless, money swallowing, civil service department because that's what the country really needs right now.

  

Environmentalists and climate change

When I was at school we were taught in Geography about the big meteorological changes, the last couple of Ice Ages and how woolly mammoths roamed the UK. We were warned that another ice age could happen.

Fast forward 20 years and we are warned of global warming, everywhere becoming hotter and how strawberries could be grown in Scotland.

The trouble was that the Greens realised that Global Warming was too specific and wouldn't suitably collect all the vagaries of our weather system to put within the category of Man raping the Earth. Hence they trot out Climate Change.

The climate has changed, the climate does change and the climate will change. At what point has the Earth ever had a static, unchanging weather system? It's just such a one size fit's all statement isn't it? Totally unspecific so that nothing can be pinned on it. If it's too hot, too cold, too wet or too dry - it's all down to climate change

If the name, description and effects of our impact on the environment can change in the space of a decade or so to satisfy the sensationalist needs of the green lobby how can we really determine with any consistency the long term changes in our weather patterns.

 

The smell in bars and clubs now that you don't have the masking effect of cigarette smoke

Now I know it was a pain to go home with clothes stinking of smoke but in it's absence we have to contend with a rather disgusting cocktail of arse gas, body odour, billowing toilet backdraft and bad breath on a night out.

 

The McCann's didn't make a mistake, they took a calculated risk

I have previously made a comment on the McCann's but that was not long after Maddy had going missing.

It really bugs me when people try and absolve the McCann's of blame of blame by saying that they made a mistake. No they didn't. A mistake is leaving your keys in the front door or leaving the bath running.

No, the McCann's made a calculated gamble with the safety of their children. They decided that they would leave them alone not for a one off occasion but at least three consecutive nights that we know of. They decided against using the crèche facility, decided against having a nanny stay in the apartment and decided against using the baby monitor/listening device.

I know many will say "How could they have known someone would do this?". Maybe they couldn't but they obviously didn't believe the children would be 100% safe because they left the patio door slightly ajar and I quote "in case of a fire". Hence they made a provision for one potential risk but not any others.

Hence why I say that they gambled with the safety of their kids. They decided that they would have dinner without their children and HOPE (aware that something could happen, albeit unlikely) that nothing would happen.

Now I'm sure that there maybe other parents who take this risk or gamble (along with many that don't I might add) and maybe that's ok but it's them playing the "we are whiter than white, fantastic parents" that has always stuck in my craw.

Ok be distraught, ok do what you can to find her but at the back of your mind be conscious that you rolled the dice with their safety and for once the house won. Parenting isn't about what you say, it's about what you do. Actions speak louder than words and it's all very well talking up yourself after the event but it's already happened.

 

Hugh Hefner

I appreciate that in the 60's/70's Playboy had some real cache. It had good looking women, good writers and good features. Such a shame then that Hugh didn't take a long term approach to women and establish himself as a connoisseur of genuinely beautiful women.

Instead, all of the women who inhabit his mansion look exactly the same with their bleached hair and surgical bodies. I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder but how much better would it have been if you could have had the 'Hefner stamp' for those that were naturally pretty and of fine figure rather than those who have the most money and tolerance for plastic surgery.

From being an appreciator of the female form he is now a joke of an old man shuffling around in pyjamas with a mansion full of similar looking, stepford wives robots.

 

The trouble with blogging or at least trying to connect with others through blogging

Let me start by saying that I've been observing the blogging scene (sounds a little sordid!) for over three years now and that I appreciate that my site is far from ideal.

However here's the things that I find problematic with blogging

  1. In most cases, but not all, the really polished blogs are almost the vacuous. The authors are so concerned with the look and the sizzle of it that they forget the substance or the sausage.
  2. Many, particularly from the section above, never really tell you anything revealing or have the courage to put the author in a possible bad light. It's all surface gloss and vanilla pap. Now that's fine but if one is going to take the time to try and read a blog, and in turn understand a person, then one could do with reading something more revealing that what I could hear in the supermarket queue.
  3. The chronological nature of the blog works against any newcomers. Picture the scene: You stumble across a new blog. You try to gauge an indication of the person from the meagre profile and/or try to find some static, non dated items to build a quick picture of the person. Unable to do so you start reading the entries. You read how they've shagged someone, how they had a second date with someone, how they felt after their first date, how they flirted with them in the office and how a new person had started in the office. That's not fun. It's like watching a film in reverse and it doesn't help you engage with the author. Ok, you could skip backwards a chunk and then read forwards but you haven't been given anything to make you feel it's worth doing that.
  4. People grumble that they can't leave comments on my site but ultimately what's the point? Unless you leave a comment on the very latest posting, the blog author will never see it and never respond to it. Even if you do leave a comment in the latest posting, in over 50% of the times they won't acknowledge this because you aren't part of their little clique and thus your thoughts are utterly meaningless. In fact if you see a post that has more than 20 comments it actually dissuades you from commenting because they are too popular and hence won't have the time or inclination to respond.
  5. You want to contact the blog owner after trawling back through some of their archives and finding entertainment. There is no point in commenting because by their throwaway nature they will be easily discarded so you fashion a nice email mentioning how much you've enjoyed their writing and maybe highlighting some points to at least indicate that you have read some of their posts as opposed to writing just because they've got a great rack. Do you get a response for your genuine attempt at saying hello? Very rarely.

Even though blogging is meant to encourage communication, your sincerity in wanting to communicate is discarded for being too friendly or stalky. Unless the contact is of the one line comment or one line email, you've plainly no hope. It's almost like your desire to know them and send them a complimentary email is considered a weakness.

Blogging has almost become like porn. The polished stuff is always the most soulless and over produced with no heart or substance. It's all 'fuck this' and 'I'm an empowered bitch that' all to satisfy the feckless whim of their transient readers.

Some of the blogs list over 30 or 40 blogs in their blog roll. How can they maintain a watching brief on that many without skim reading and chucking in a throwaway comment now and again to remind the author that they want to be in their little gang.

There are some genuine, interesting and polished blogs out there but they are very rare. In the most parts if you want to read about a real person then you need to find a blog that doesn't have all the bells and whistles, isn't obsessed by the newly updated font colour, isn't afraid of offending their readership and hasn't already generated a 20+ commenting crowd.


Myspace and Facebook profiles set to private

What a waste of time on a social networking site. The only people that can see your profile are those that already know you. Why bother having a profile?

It's almost as stupid as those that want to add you whilst making no attempt to engage you.

 

Stickiness of shit

I know this is an icky subject but you do have to put your hand up and congratulate the adhesive qualities of human shit.

I mean here's something that can affix itself to what must be the most slippery surface known to man. Vertical, wet porcelain.

Amazing.

 

How sad I've become with those late night text adverts

It seems that because I find myself stumbling across so many of those late night, text 'sexy' adverts that I've actually started to notice a model who has been appearing in a 'series' of these adverts.

Now it's not like I've been sitting in front of the TV with a stack of Kleenex on my knee in preparation but I'm always guilty of flicking when the adverts come on and it seems many channels time their adverts to come at the same time.

Normally the models are fake titted munters trying way too hard to look sexy and never seem to appear in more than one advert. This particular company however must be doing well as it appears that they've commissioned a run of adverts with the same three models. So far we've had the indoor pool, the Jacuzzi, the gym and now the outdoor pool.

What makes this one girl stand out? Needless to say it isn't her acting skills or her sense of humour but rather a pretty face, blonde hair, a little softness and a killer rack.

Man, I either need to get out more or go to bed earlier!

 

Why I wear my silly t-shirts

A woman recently emailed me to ask why I wore my 'insulting' t-shirts (check in the galleries for some examples) when girls preferred chatting to nice guys. Here is the bones of my response:

"As to your thoughts on the t-shirt, it's a valid point but ultimately when out in a bar/club, people don't look over and see the 'nice guy' tag floating above your head. They need to see something else to make you stand out. Some rely on their looks, some on revealing clothes.

Why do many women wear short skirts, high heels or low cut tops to accentuate parts of their body, if not to look more attractive than others and be noticed? I've had many years of anonymity from wearing smart shirts and not hiding as you would call it. Trust me, very little happens.

I don't know if you are in a relationship or are married but I would say that those who are have a completely skewed perception of what male/female interaction is like in the real world. You don't just walk up to someone and say 'Hey I'm a nice guy, can I buy you a drink'. They'd look at you like you were a weirdo or seek a restraining order.

You also don't meet people at the gym, in the bread aisle of your supermarket or at a pottery class. In most cases it's either work, where they get to know you as a person, or in a pub/club, where they go on first impressions.

Girls rarely approach guys, so you need to give them an excuse or an ice breaker if they wanted to. That t-shirt, and other similar ones, has got women talking to me on quite a few occasions and it seems the more risqué they are, the more they comment. Ok, the easily offended, morally righteous, humourless ones might not comment but really, why would I want them to?

I don't expect it to lead to marriage or even a date but if the t-shirts amuse people (and I've seen them bring a smile to many) then so be it and if not, then you can't please everyone."

 

What hand do you wipe your arse with

Another totally unimportant question but I am right handed yet I wipe with my left.

Going from a straw pole in the office this seems to make me an oddball. Does everyone else who favours a hand (ie right handed / left handed) use that same hand to wipe?

 

Your favourite Mr Man character

Mine was always Mr Funny. I just loved that crazy hat with the flower sticking out and those huge shoes.

 

The media bothering to cover the Zimbabwe elections

I know I'm being hugely cynical but really, why are the media wasting so much coverage on the elections in Zimbabwe?

Does anyone really believe that they are anything close to democratic? Or that Mugabe would ever say 'fair cop, I've been voted out, here's the keys, off you go'.

With the kind of corruption existing there, more white farms being 'seized' (I didn't know there were any left to be honest) and some rather dubious tactics going on it's hard to believe that if anyone new did get in they would be radically different.

 

Paedophile paranoia

Paedophilia is wrong, sick and demented. I just thought I'd get that in before I get labelled as some kind of advocate of it.

I have to say that the media and government really do work themselves up into a frenzy about paedophiles and the internet. Read any alarmist paper and you would believe that it's possible to go on any social networking site and have an 11 year old girl sucking on your cock in under 3 hours.

Ok precautions might need to be taken but really is it that easy to groom someone that quickly. Kids are pretty clever nowadays and I do sometimes think that maybe it's older adults lack of understanding of the net that makes so many go 'knee-jerk' about it.

I see the government are trying to introduce a rule where all sex offenders have to provide an email address which will then allow the social network sites to ban them. Are they aware how easy it is to get another email address?

You can't police the internet, you can only try to control those that use it. So as well as preventing the so called millions of middle aged paedos, maybe parents could be encouraged to take a little control or interest in what their kids are doing.

Talking on the internet is one thing but surely it's actually meeting up with strangers where the real danger lies and instead of distracting talk about chatting on the net maybe we should ram home the campaign that ran when I was younger of not getting in cars with or accepting gifts from strangers, let alone arranging to meet up.

A survey by Ofcom found that nearly half of children aged eight to 17 had a profile on a social networking site and a third of those aged nine to 19 who used the internet weekly had received sexual comments via e-mail, instant message, chat or text message.

I just did a quick search on faceparty for girls between 16 and 17 and in just two pages came across profiles and pictures of 'Kinky-bitch-is-hot', 'Ashleigh-lvz-u', 'getwanked' and 'l-a-u-r-e-n-p who describes herself as being loud, bubbly and having massive jubblies'. There are more tit shots on there than a Channel 5 text 'sexy' advert.

Makes you wonder what percentage of the Ofcom stats are of the 16-19 age bracket and how their manipulation of the overall results is deliberate to make this sound more alarming.

Now again, I'm not saying we shouldn't be cautious and I think convicted Paedos deserve surgical castration but I think some balanced, sensible heads should be looking at this rather than crowd pleasing, ill advised headlong rushers.

 

Homosexuals and showers in the Armed Forces

I don't necessarily have a problem with gays in the armed forces. People's sexual preference is up to them and if they are good soldiers and don't make a big deal or fuss about it I would hope that it wouldn't get in the way. When though the gay lobby are so keen to keep banging on about it and blowing it up into this big issue I would like to know what their thoughts are on how the shower situation should be played.

With men and women now serving together in the armed forces, why do they not have mixed showers? (as they show in the film Starship Troopers for instance) It would cut down on time and money and if sex isn't an issue in the armed forces anymore why would it be a problem?

Of course the problem is that females would undoubtedly feel uncomfortable being naked in front of gawping heterosexual males and the men would apparently not be able to control their sexual lust. How come then if gays are being openly debated with this goddamn fanfare are they not creating separate hetero and homosexual showers?

Why is it deemed that a homosexual soldier showering with other men would maintain his self control and arousal level and that heterosexual males should not feel uncomfortable BUT that a heterosexual soldier in the company of a woman would turn into a raging, sex crazed ape?

I'm sure gays would respond with a typical "we don't fancy all men you know" and I'm sure this is true but why is it assumed that straight men would fancy all women?

Before I get flamed for being fascist and homophobic just ask yourself: If it's not right for males and females to shower together in the armed forces, why is it ok for hetero and homo males to do so?

 

Best boxing matches you've ever seen

Following on from the excitement of Saturdays Hatton vs Mayweather what are the best boxing matches you have seen? I've put mine below with YouTube links where possible.

Benn vs McClellan

Probably my favourite for balls to the wall guts was Nigel Benn vs Gerald McClellan. It's a shame what happened to Gerald but he was a hard punching thug who thought he would roll over Benn.

He didn't reckon on one of the most courageous boxers we've ever had refusing to surrender and despite getting knocked out of the ring in the 1st round and then knocked down in the 8th, batter McClellan to the point where he simply gave up in the 10th. A truly awesome display of boxing but one that Benn has never truly got the respect for due to what happened post fight to Gerald.

This fight makes Benn my all time favourite boxer. He embodies everything I want to see in a British fighter. He refuses to give up and gave it back to the cocky yanks.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZ9yRbrKLxw

This just shows the first couple of rounds. Look at the profile of the uploader to see the other parts. It's definately worth it.

Eubank vs Watson II

I remember this being on whilst I was in a nightclub and seeing it on a huge screen. The two had met before and Watson had been denied, as many saw, a points victory. When they met again Watson was far more aggressive and the two duked it like nobody's business. Their 11th round is one of the most amazing I've seen.

Two boxers punching themselves out to exhaustion. Watson looking tired and then coming back to catch Eubank with two bombs flush on the chin that forced him down to the ground. Eubank should technically have taken a count but full credit to the man. The first time he ever gets put down and he gets up and hits Watson so hard with an uppercut that Watson crashes to the ground smacking his head on the ropes which most likely contributed to his brain damage.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvh9-xr0gOQ

The quality is pretty poor and only shows the last two rounds but it's enough for you to get the idea of the fight. Like the Benn v McClelland fight it's hard to find any decent footage.

Hagler vs Hearns

Quite possibly the best three rounds of boxing, definitely the best first round, that you might ever see. Two different styles, just toe to toe swinging and pounding away at each other.

With the ferocity of the punching and the fact that Hagler was cut meant it couldn't have really lasted more than three rounds without someone crumbling.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYHSHd1xfpY

Bruno vs Tyson

Some may laugh at me for this and I admit that it wasn't a great fight. There is also the fact that big Frank didn't win it. What does need to be noted though is that when Bruno is dismissed as some kind of pantomine fool he did have the courage to get in the ring with 'Iron' Mike Tyson when he was at his most dominant and dangerous.

Frank might have got put down within the first 20 seconds but he still got back up, brawled with Tyson enough to be deducted a point for punching him in the side of the head and most importantly landing a bomb on the side of Tyson's head that proved to the world that Tyson could be rocked. Remember that this was a time long before Buster Douglas, when Mike drove fear into the hearts of many boxers and he was believed virtually undefeatable.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ladnb7-ciLc

 

Wary of reporting crime at the Notting Hill Carnival

Why is it that the police and media are so wary of reporting negatively on the crime that takes place at the Notting Hill carnival? Is it because they are scared of negatively reporting on a predominantly ethnic event?

The police talk about the amount of arrests being down this year but it would be interesting to know the amount of incidents reported because let's face it, not all criminal acts result in an arrest.

Although desperate to keep everything upbeat, the news had to report that even though there were less incidents, there were still TWO shootings and ONE stabbing at the carnival this year.

 

Over dramatic home appliance failures

I was in the sauna recently and heard a guy talking about how his boiler had blown up and I got to thinking, really did it actually blow up? I wondered if there were any other appliance malfunctions that received similar inflated descriptions. The only other one I've heard is about dishwashers exploding.



Length of shorts

OK I'll put my hand up. I'm a middle aged man that isn't adverse to wearing shorts. If the weather is hot enough then I think I little fresh air blowing around my legs is quite pleasant and cooling.

If I can I'll wear shorts that end above the knee though nothing as tight or as short as what Magnum used to wear. I can even take the more recent fad of 3/4 lengths and actually have a couple of pairs.

But can someone explain the latest offering which are like 7/8th's. What's the point? They are too long to be considered as shorts and hence have none of the cooling abilities, yet are too short to be trousers. People who buy them might as well just buy a pair of ankle swingers.


I really like snails

I'm not usually a big insect fan. The kind that fly deserve immediate extermination, apart from bee's and butterflies that is, and spiders are treated with a modicum of respect. There's just something about snails though that I find really endearing.

I don't know if it's because they carry their homes on their back, that they move slowly or that they don't look offensive but I always do everything I can not to accidentally tread on them. I remember times when we lived at our other house and after a drive I'd come home, open the gate to drive my car in and have to carefully move about 10 - 15 snails off the drive so I wouldn't crush them.

  

Fat men and the waistband of their trousers

I've always been intrigued at what point it is that really fat men go from having the waistband of their trousers under the over hang of their belly to having it over the top?

If you think about it's a huge decision as it can add a lot of inches to the waistband as well as a big increase in the amount of material needed for that front gusset.

 

Well done to Take That

I have to say that I'm delighted that these guys have got back together. I'm not a massive fan who goes to their concerts or even has any of their albums. But I wish them well because they seem nice, down to earth, happy to have another chance kind of guys.

What's especially sweet is how just as they re-find success that Robbie Williams seems to fall away. I never could stand him. Granted some of his earlier songs were good but I got very tired at his continual bleating and whining about how unhappy he was. What was more astonishing were the amount of girls who thought he could do no wrong.

Here was this arrogant chump who could and would shag a bevy of beauties but never be tarred with the playboy brush because he'd pull on the sad eyes and say how he was just looking for love and the right girl. Meaning that he kept all his options open because every woman would think maybe they could be the one that could make him happy.

I'm not knocking him having for fun and if I was in the same position I would have the same fun though I wouldn't always talk about it negatively. It's just the blind gullibility of some girls that can't see him for what he is, that is so infuriating.  

 

Jimmy Saville. Godfather of bling

Really. If you look at Sir Jimmy he was the very first to live the bling dream that so many rappers aspire to.

Always in a leisure suit, dripping with massive, chunky jewellery, smoking a fat cigar and certainly when he introduced Top of the Pops surrounded by sweet honeys.

 

The case of the missing Madeleine girl

 

Considering so many parents have those baby listening monitors when they are simply downstairs the idea of leaving not one, but three, children alone in a room when you are in another building, 100 metres away is a touch irresponsible in my book.

I realise the temptation to have some time to yourself must be strong but surely your kids are your most precious things, especially at that age, so pissing off out for a meal while they fend for themselves is plain wrong. Even if they were all asleep, there's a good chance that one out of three will wake up.

Harsh maybe, but if you want to be a parent you have to accept that there will be sacrifices needed, inconveniences to suffer and responsibilities to take. The hotel complex offers the services of a drop off crèche for parents along with designated room sitters if required but none of these were taken.

 

Don't get me wrong I hope little Mady is returned safe and sound and she shouldn't pay for the failings of her parents but I do find my sympathy levels a little restricted when I see the mum and dad crowing about how worried they are for Mady when having dinner with friends was more important. I know someone shouldn't break into your hotel room but we've all got CNN or see the news and we know that the world is an increasingly unpleasant place.

 

I find just as distasteful the 'you must feel overcome with sympathy' line and the ingratiating manner in which celebrities/politicians etc are jumping on the band wagon to appear sensitive and curry favour with the moronic public.

 

It's up to an individual to decide who they wish to sympathise with and I find unpleasant the pressure and brow beating that everyone has to share the same level of concern, otherwise they are unfeeling animals. The same kind of mass outpouring occurred with Diana's death. It turned into a media frenzy with people vilified if they didn't display similar over dramatic, tokenistic wailing that others did.

I mean look at this one. We've got John Terry making an appeal, Glasgow and Rangers saying they will play with armbands, businessmen queuing up to offer rewards, MP's wearing yellow ribbons and the Everton team getting involved. Everyone jumping on the wagon to associate their remorse with the cause trivialises what is a serious criminal matter. You end up with a place where no one dare express a negative opinion for fear that a PC lynch mob will berate them for not having a sympathy level as high as everyone else.

 

People's hypocrisy can be illuminating. Most couldn't give two shits that kids are dying every day in Africa, no one loses sleep about the genocide that takes place in far flung corners of the world but see a pretty, white, middle class girl be snatched and we should stop the world and call out the United Nations.

Let's keep it in perspective. It's a nasty thing that has happened, there are nasty people out there, the parents didn't behave brilliantly and our thoughts, for those that wish to have them, are with the frightened little girl.

 

Guide dogs

It never ceases to amaze me when I think of guide dogs how wonderful they are. To think that they take the responsibility of a human in their paws and that people are prepared to put their faith fully in that of an animal is both wonderous and incredible.

 

Traffic light jumpers

It never ceases to amaze me when driving in London that on the few (!) occasions that I might scrape through a set of traffic lights when they are on amber, how a quick look in the mirror reveals another three and sometimes four cars that have followed me through.

You can't help but laugh and think 'Christ, I was close but they must have blatantly run a red'

 

Racism or bullying

This thought was helped into my consciousness by the recent big brother furore. I'm not a racist and cannot abide bullies but it's an interesting line that if you ridicule someone:

For being fat (fat bastard) - you are a bully

For their ginger hair (ginge bastard) - you are a bully

For wearing glasses (four eyed bastard) - you are a bully

For the colour of their skin (brown bastard) - you are a racist

All are unpleasant yet why are the first three considered unkind and the last one almost criminal. Being made fun of for the colour of your hair must be just as uncomfortable as that of your skin.

Legislating against what people say as opposed to what they do will always be a contentious issue.

 

Greenpeace car stickers

Can anyone else see the irony

 

Feeling for the Conservative leader

You have to laugh at the fickle nature of the media and public when discussing opposition leaders. They are currently berating David Cameron for being too image obsessed and populist when he should be concentrating on sound policies.

Wasn't that what the previous leader, Ian Duncan Smith, did but was then ridiculed for not having a persona or enough razzmatazz. With the media so quick to pigeonhole and label everyone is it any wonder that the public simply can't be arsed anymore.

 

Really cheap toys

I must confess that when younger the idea of cheap toys horrified me. By cheap I don't mean inexpensive, but rather the nasty tat you find for sale on dusty shelves in post offices & newsagents above the cigarette rack, made by companies that you've never heard and using the sharpest, thinnest and most brittle plastics.

Normally they'd be fire engines or such, supplied with unbranded batteries that contained enough charge for 15 minutes, buttons that wouldn't work and the only element of real creation being in the packaging copy which was perfect for wooing the lazy purchaser that this was in fact the greatest toy ever made.

Even now the notion of anyone ever buying this for a child is still concerning and I think stems from my father once buying me an aforementioned piece of shit.

 

Never seeing an emergency vehicle stuck in traffic

I realise that when racing to an emergency they shouldn't hang around but what about when they are coming back or just driving around. I've never seen one being delayed so either they are incredibly fortunate or simply class heading back to HQ for a cup of tea as another emergency.

 

Chav's and exterior christmas decorations

Really, what award is it they are going for or hoping to win with these energy sapping, un co-ordinated arrangements of colour on the side of their house. Is it to divert people's gaze from their gaudy stone cladding. Is it to be the biggest prick in the street. What pleasure do they get from it when they can't actually see it and what does it say about the quality of their interior decorations.

I've nothing against some of the more subtle ones where they've highlighted the line of the roof in plain white fairy lights or decorated a garden tree but these gaudy mis-matches of bright colour replete with illuminated figures of Santa in a sleigh, or even more irrelevant a hot air ballon, do confound me.

 

The world's strongest man

Are these televised events worth watching anymore. Not since the years of Geoff Cape, and that was a good twenty years ago, have I seen one that's been hard fought or even remotely close. There is always a contestant who wins every event with ease and then has to explain to the 'struggling for anecdotal material' host why he excels in this particular event. 

 

Differing tap pressures at other people houses

How many times have you been to someone else's house, turned on the tap to get a drink or wash up and the pressure has taken you by surprise and you ended up doused in water.

Even better is how some taps turn one way and others the other way. This can in turn generate hilarious soakings as you attempt to turn off a tap yet end up increasing it to fire hose levels of force.

 

I like David Hasselhoff

You gotta love the Hoff. Not only was he the star on a seminal 80's show that I loved as I grew up he also put his and some other investors money where his mouth is to buy the rights of Baywatch and market it to the world.

He doesn't take himself seriously, does have a good voice (my bro saw him live in Chicago and confirmed that he can certainly hold a note) and isn't one of those actors who makes his name in something and then does all he can to distance himself from it.

He's self deprecating, entertaining, funny and obviously likes a drink. I think he'd be great to hang with.

 

Using your head to increase the range of your car key

It never ceases to amaze me how when you get too far away from your car that clicking the remote locking button doesn't seem to work that if you hold the key against your head the range of the fob increases and you can now lock or unlock your car.

Maybe it's irradiating my brain or just turning my body into one big antenna but it always makes me smile.

 

The arrival of 'indulgent offerings' in fast food chains 

I was reading a welcoming article recently about how fast food chains are bringing in large meals and burgers that are vegetable free and unashamedly unhealthy. It's in response to how even though members of the public might have filled in surveys and questionnaires saying that they wanted more fruit and veg, in reality they didn't.

What they seemed to forget was that the fast food chains customers weren't the self righteous filmmakers or pompous healthy eaters who would never visit a McDonalds. They were in fact Joe Average who only had four or five pounds in his pocket, was hungry and wanted some hot food pronto.

I'm glad that the chains offer healthier options if customers want it but moreso delighted that they haven't completely bowed down to the food fascists. That they still assume that there are members of the public who would like the choice to consume a big, juicy, meaty, fattening burger if they damn well please.


The failure of multiculturalism

The policies of appeasement and over tolerance of an immigrants culture at the expense and detriment of our own are doing more harm than good. Accepting another person's culture is fine but the culture of the country which that individual has chosen to live in should prevail. Attempts to alter this to suit the desires of those coming in, or worse still, an acceptance that they can live outside of the existing culture only leads to disharmony and a lack of integration in my opinion.

I'm not suggesting a totalitarian Anglo-Saxon culture and nothing else. I think the cultural diversity within this country is great but I do think it is something that gradually happens over time as communities 'cross-over'. I think when councils or governments positively enforce it, it can lead to frustrations. There has to be a 'base' culture if you will that acts as the social glue between communities.

If we aren't connected by something (call it 'British-ness' if you will) then what are we held together by? If there isn't some form of adhesion, some form of shared collective, then are we just a disparate collection of communities spiralling ever further away from each other.

I'm not sure if citizen tests are the way forward but I do believe that as an immigrant coming to a country, that host country does need a residual identity and culture for you to grasp and embrace. If it doesn't, and you as an immigrant do not wish to embrace it, then why would you have come here?

A year or so back high profile figures within the ethnic communities, such as Trevor Phillips and George Alagiah, suggested that the policies of appeasement and over tolerance of an immigrant's culture at the expense and detriment of our own are doing more harm than good.

It's a little frustrating that when people in the late 80's and early 90's said the same things they were told to be quiet and branded racists. I guess the term 'xenophobic Daily Mail reader' hadn't evolved at that point! The trouble is that having lost sight of our culture, or pride in it, getting it back through 'British' tests and other measures seems overly forced and almost draconian.

It's a shame that even when members of the ethnic communities have recognised it's failings that we are still prevented from having the "frank and honest debate" that politicians always promise but never have the courage to initiate.

 

Have DFS, or any other store, ever sold a piece of furniture at full price

I don't think there has ever been a time that DFS didn't have a sale on or be offering interest free credit until 2020. Makes you wonder how they'd react if you said I would like to buy this item at full price and in cash.

 

Nike or Adidas

I'm not a chav who regularly bums around in tracksuits drinking Stella but I was pondering when in the gym recently which sport brand I prefer, Nike or Adidas?

You can't deny that Nike always feel like quality items. If you stayed round someones house and they lent you a Nike hoody, although not normally that colourful and crazy they do have an assured quality feel to them. Their logo is very distinctive and they are exceptional at what they do.

For me though it has to be Adidas. I like their brand and I think they do more with it. Their materials are a little more innovative and they are more prepared to experiment with colours. They also aren't afraid to use, albeit sparingly, neon green and fluoro orange, two colours that I really dig. I think they are a little more creative with, and integrate more, their three stripes logo into all the clothes that they produce.

 

Carrying shopping from your car

Next time they do The Worlds Strongest Man or Superstars they really should have a contest that involves seeing who can carry the most amount of shopping bags/items from the car in one journey.

I don't park my car that far away from my front door but it's just enough that I'd rather struggle to the door with my arms practically coming out of their sockets and the handles cutting off the circulation to my fingers than have to go back a second time.

I think my limit is about seven or eight, with a gym bag over my head and shoulders and a set of keys dangling precariously from my mouth.

 

The West Wing

Ok I know my favourite TV shows like Angel and Quantum Leap are hardly realistic but I did get very tired, very quickly of the supermen and women that were meant to be employed in The West Wing.

These people apparently work from 6.00am in the morning, write three speeches, handle a diplomatic crisis in Latin America, chair an urban regeneration forum, spend the afternoon with a trade delegation from Indonesia and stay up late prepping for the following days live broadcast from the senate. They are eventually told to go home by their boss at around 4.00am yet still apparently manage an hour in the gym, the chance to grab a shower and a bagel and return to the office 50 minutes later having explained the small business tax situation in North Dakota to the bus driver. What's more they manage all of this without getting haggard or older, creasing their clothes, smelling or even getting a five o'clock shadow.

I can understand the need to make them seem aspirational but plain unbelievable is another thing.

 

The skin on your arse

After thanking god or evolution for the wonder of self pleasure you have to raise a glass to thank him / it for the layer of skin covering your bottom (and for us blokes the skin of the nut sack).

No matter how many times you scratch it, it never gets sore and delivers the same dose of tingling, relaxing pleasure on the 100th scratch as it did on the 1st.

 

Lebanon and Beirut

I'm not going to get embroiled in the politics of who fired first in the latest troubles in the area but I must comment on one aspect. Seeing journalists doing reports from rubble strewn Beirut and talking about the piazza's of laughing children and bustling, colourful markets that existed before does stick in my craw.

Beirut has been one big, anarchic, lawless, crumbling mess of destroyed buildings for about fifteen years now and although the bombing isn't helping it certainly hasn't been fully responsible for the state that city is in now.

 

They say a picture paints a thousand words

This might be true in the real world but I've got to say that in the blog world that I've been recently perusing it's the opposite. Sifting through a multitude of images of peoples kids, dogs, kitchens or obscure, artistic photographs tells me zippo about the person.

In the blog world you can paint a far more personal and illuminating portrait of the person with what they write and how they write it. I read blogs to get into the minds of maybe similarly like minded people and images have the opposite effect. They are also a cheap way I think of hiding an inability to generate written content. I guess some people are turned on or tuned into pictures and others, and for me, it's writing.

  

The smell of the inside of your nose

What does this smell like I wonder. If you think about it you never really get to find out because you are always smelling everything in the air around you. I have a theory though.

When you sneeze the very first smell you get immediately afterwards is like an oxide smell and I think that this is actually what the inside of your nose smells like. Almost as if the sneeze forcibly expels all the air from your nostrils so that the first inhalation you take is nose smell before the surrounding smells come in to dilute it.

A mad theory maybe but something at least to ponder.

 

Everything ending up inside the duvet cover

I wondered if they have invented a mathematical formula yet to explain how it is that everything within the washing machine will end up inside the duvet cover unless you popper it up. When I pull that baby out after a wash I feel like hoisting it over my shoulder and setting off on an expedition.

 

Getting dressed in a swimming pool cubicle

At home I can have a bath or shower, dry myself off and get dressed quite comfortably so how come as soon as the location is changed to a cubicle in a swimming pool I have more difficulty than Stephen Hawking.

Underwear and trousers refuse to rise up my legs without getting stuck at the ankles and knees, by the time they get there they have managed to completely twist round, the wristband on my jumper has shrunk to stop my hand getting through and a hump suddenly appears at the base of my neck preventing any top from sliding down and covering my back.

Couple this with socks that refuse to go on, hair that refuses to stay down and a wet towel that seems to have trebled in size and I end up walking out looking like some kind of special needs retard or a skateboarding youth. 

 

Being a misery at my local supermarket

Do you want help with the packing - No but thanks

Do you have a nectar card - No, I'm afraid I do not

Do you have a car parking ticket - No

Are you collecting school vouchers - Jesus, no I'm not

Do you want cashback - For fucksake no, just take my money and let me leave.

 

The recent lottery TV advert

What a lovely advert this is. Simple concept but bearing in mind what they normally turn out this is surprisingly good and with its classical music and recreation of bricks as migrating birds is almost moving.

 

Buying plots of land on the moon

Really, who is stupid enough to buy these. Don't these people ever wonder who will be enforcing their ownership if and when we colonise the moon.

It's the same with naming stars. Do we expect future space captains to grandly announce that they are entering the John Smith system.

 

Life expectancy (shelf life) of stick deodorant

I might not be the best looking guy in the world but I do try to smell nice and am paranoid of kicking up. Hence in the morning I apply both underarm stick deodorant and then an all over spray.

The thing about the stick though, and I'm not saying I've got acid sweat, is that after two months or so your pits seem to develop immunity to it and it just gives up. Almost like the stick creates a barrier and then over time your body figures out a way to beat it. This means that every two months one has to upgrade or source a new stick as your old one has become so useless that you might as well rub an ice cream under your arms.

 

The gym and pub/clubbing is always a good leveller

Whenever you go to the gym, pub or a club you can always guarantee that you will see someone worse than you - be it fatter, uglier, smellier, worst dressed to make you feel better about yourself and think 'hey, maybe I'm not that bad'.

Within five minutes though you can be certain that you will see someone that is bigger (ie muscley), more handsome, better dressed than you to remind you of your place. Oh, what it must be like to be top of the food chain.

  

Premature toilet flushing

This could well be limited to us guys but I do find I'm somethimes prone to starting the flush process before I've actually finished pissing. It's a hollow victory when you consider what's left in the pan but there is something immensely satisfying in just beating the flush.

 

The pitfalls of corn flakes

How frustrating is it when you fancy a nice bowl of corn flakes or frosties, shake them into the bowl, pour on the ice cold milk and then manage to hit that one upturned flake that manages to piss the milk back out of the bowl and across the counter.

 

Good vest wearers

Overlooking the fact that a crisp white vest has been tarred with the labelling of yellowing, sweat encrusted, food drying wife beaters there are some good advertisements for the wearing of vests:

Bruce Willis - Die Hard

Mickey Rourke - Sin City

Chris Isaak - Wicked Game video

Ed Norton - American History X

 

The joy of Ikea

As well as having fantastic meatballs and gravy I do love taking the time to amble round Ikea at half speed. I never seriously consider buying anything but prefer instead to dream whimsically of owning an empty, blank canvas style apartment where I could move around selecting different items of furniture to populate my pad with.

Better to have this utopian dream than corrupt it by purchasing the odd piece here and there I say (you now think I live in a dank cave).

 

Rain is romantic but not as much as snow

I've decided that I like the rain.  I don't do as many things that are weather dependant as most and I know that after saying this I will be cursed with bad weather for ever more but there is something good about rain I think.  It clears the unnecessary folks from the streets.  Less people walk for fear of getting wet and people will be more inclined to stay indoors hence the roads seem a little emptier.

Yes it can be miserable but clothes can dry and with short hair I'm never worried about that getting wet. Walking in the rain, if isn't too cold can almost feel cathartic. Almost like as you feel the dirt being flushed out of the air you can somehow feel some of your own worries or concerns being cleansed with it. There's also something lonely about walking in the rain, like you just don't give a damn anymore. I've always imagined that the most passionate kiss would be in the rain. Where both parties were more concerned with each other than the triviality of getting wet.

Even with all these reasons the ultimate wonder for me lies with falling snow.  Anything else that falls from the sky (rain, sleet, hail) makes a noise but snow just simply falls.  You can't hear it, you can just see it. Like it's quietly getting on with it's business of creating a white blanket and not making a fuss. Maybe I also have images of women wrapped up warm yet with cold, rosy cheeks and flakes of snow gently landing in their hair.

Either way snow is the most romantic but rain's benefits should not be overlooked.

 

Mother's day and every single woman

Why does every single woman, no matter how old or whether they have children feel compelled to remind every man of his duty to buy a Mothers day card.

You never see the same amount of pressure or persuassion from men, or even women, approaching Fathers Day.

 

Record breaking months for weather

Why does every single month have to be, or feature, a record breaking event of pointless tedium.

"The wettest consecutive Tuesdays in a month, the mildest Saturday of an Easter holiday for 100 years or the most snowfall on a Thursday in Exeter in the month of November". 

 

Same shit, different year

Examples of things repeated to us year in, year out.

The media talk of an 'Indian' summer - let's get it straight that in the UK the summer runs from July to October.

The rail fare commuter group - Every January they get on their high horse 'demanding an improvement to services' yet by February are queuing with the rest of the mugs to pay an extra 7% for their ticket with no increase to the level of service.

Exam results (GCSE) - How many times have you got to hear about how easy they are 'now', and to prove your point get a swotty girl (live on GMTV) at a private school opening her envelope to reveal 9 A stars and look surprised.

Exam results (A level) - Repeat the whole episode above word for word about two weeks later.

and Finally when the media in the event of there being no 'real' news ask "how long can houses prices stay so artificially high?" - Well I guess as long as people keep buying them.

 

Tip of your knob touching the inside of the toilet bowl

I'm not claiming to have a huge one and I wouldn't say that I sit that far forward but there is something really unpleasant when you are innocently sitting on the toilet and feel the tip of your knob touch the cold enamel of the inside of the toilet bowl.

As if its not enough that you receive that sudden jolt of retraction it's the notion that your tip has just brushed the area where some would concentrate their urine flow. For all the bacteria that might be present there you might as well have just flopped your tackle into the mouth of a Komodo dragon. 

 

What's worse

Imitation alloy hub caps or the multitude of plastic ties holding them on.

 

Feeling compelled to complete a million tasks when you sense an imminent dump

You can laze through a day at home, pottering around, perusing old newspapers and making unneccesary cups of tea yet feel the tingle of an oncoming toilet trip and suddenly there are loads of things to do.

Almost as if the 'dump time' will be such wasted time that it will be easier to enjoy it if you have accomplished, or at least started, some tasks.

Indeed you spend so much time suddenly putting on washing, refilling the kettle, turning it on, putting the dishes into soak and grabbing some reading material that you run a genuine risk of actually shitting yourself.

 

Discarded underwear in the shower cubicles at my gym

What is that about? Who just drops their kacks, showers and then wanders off? You could fully stock a Primark from the amount of clothing that I must see on the shower floor.

 

Messages on Faceparty, hotmail or tidyaddict

Feeling your heart lift as you think 'hey someone might have written or responded to one of my tentative messages' for it to come crashing back down again as you realise, and deep down knew, that its just an advert offering you to upgrade your membership so you can highlight in greater detail the lack of action your profile gets.

 

Feeling a little wary of

Having the car stereo volume at number 13. I've got a stalk for the controls on mine and I might flick it a few times, see the 13 and then think well it could be a little quieter or louder.

 

People that drive wearing hats

Aren't these just the worst drivers ever.  Either baseball cap attired chavs or flat cap wearing doddery old bastards.

 

Buying a DVD that you haven't seen in years

Only for it to then be on TV less than a week later.

 

Are you a folder or scruncher?

When I go to the toilet I'm a definite folder.  Anyone who scrunches is subscribing to anarchy and chaos and that ain't a good thing when you are about to wipe your arse.

 

I like the Polish

I always feel they've gotten a real bum deal out of the last century. We might have gone to war for them but it didn't stop them being invaded by Germany and then after the country had been smashed to pieces being taken over by the Russians.  Poor sods, they try to do the right thing but end up being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Even when they had the balls to stage an uprising in Warsaw to liberate their own city they fell foul of international politics and a Red Army that didn't want to help for fear that Poland would want independance after the war.  After killing nearly 16,000 Germans and fighting for over two months the Poles were broken with over 200,000 civilian casualties, the remaining 700,000 forced to leave Warsaw and almost 85% of it destroyed.

They seem a tough, plucky little race and I've got a lot of time for their national identity.

 

I Tunes radio

Wow, wicked. No more having to play the same old playlist. I now have a host of dance, trance and house stations which ever changing fresh music to listen to while I pontificate on what next to write on my site. Outstanding!

 

The so called curse of winning the lottery

I saw in a paper recently an article about lottery winners who haven't found happiness and had been struck by the curse of the lottery.

It isn't a curse, it's just they were too stupid to not keep their anonymity and are now blighted by begging letters and people watching their every move coupled with jealous/greedy friends and relatives who assume they are entitled to some of the cash and will sell their story if they don't get any.

Someone winning millions is hardly a curse.